Observational studyActa dermato-venereologica2022
Sonidegib in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: a Retrospective Study.
Observational study in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Real-World Treatment Patterns of Patients with Basal Cell Carcinoma Using Sonidegib and Vismodegib: Discontinuation Rates and Clinical Conditions During Treatment.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Sonidegib in Vismodegib-Exposed Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: Insights From a Multicenter Descriptive Study.Journal of skin cancer · 2026Article
- Neoadjuvant Hedgehog Inhibitors for Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: Insights from Two Real-world Cases.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review on Current Systemic Treatments and the Neoadjuvant Approach.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- Multicenter Retrospective Andalusian Study of the Use of Sonidegib for the Treatment of Local Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma in Real Clinical Practice.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- The role of Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathway in cancer.Molecular biomedicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sonidegib, a hedgehog pathway inhibitor, is indicated for treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, based on the results of the BOLT study. However, to date, no real-world study of sonidegib has been reported. An observational, retrospective, single-centre study (PaSoS study) was conducted. The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of sonidegib for treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting. Secondary objectives included modalities of use, tolerability, tumour evolution, and management after discontinuation. A total of 21 patients treated with sonidegib were included from March 2018 to January 2021. The median follow-up was 18.7 months and median exposure 7.0 months. Objective response (OR) rate was 81.0% (n = 17) including 6 (29%) patients with a complete response (CR). Disease control rate was 100%. First tumour response was rapid, with a median time of 2.3 months. Nine (43%) patients underwent surgery after sonidegib discontinuation, and no relapse was observed. All the patients experienced at least 1 adverse event (AE). Muscle spasms were the most frequent AE (n = 14; 67%), followed by dysgeusia (n = 8; 38%) and alopecia (n = 12; 57%). The efficacy and safety profile of sonidegib in this first-to-date real-life trial are consistent with prior results. Overall, real-world evidence corroborated sonidegib efficacy and tolerability as a first-line treatment for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.