Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35604036›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Macrophages of the M1 and M2 types play a role in keloids pathogenesis.

Wael M Seoudy, Sara M Mohy El Dien, Talal A Abdel Reheem, Mona M Elfangary, Moatasem A Erfan

RetractedOpen access · goldAbstract readRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. LangerinClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The Role of CD28 and CD8International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  14. High M2/M1 Macrophage Ratio Observed in Nasal Polyps Formed in Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wael M SeoudyDepartment of Dermatology, STDs & Andrology, Misr University for Science & Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt.
Sara M Mohy El DienDepartment of Dermatology, STDs & Andrology, Misr University for Science & Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt.
Talal A Abdel ReheemDepartment of Dermatology, STDs & Andrology, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.
Mona M ElfangaryDepartment of Dermatology, STDs & Andrology, Misr University for Science & Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt.
Moatasem A ErfanDepartment of General Surgery, Misr University for Science & Technology (MUST), Giza, Egypt.
Misr University for Science and Technology · EGFayoum University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology of keloid formation is unknown, however, macrophages are thought to play a role in keloid formation. Understanding the mechanism(s) of keloid development might be crucial in developing a new treatment regimen for keloids. The aim of this study was to understand possible status of M1 and M2 type macrophages in the pathogenesis of keloid. Thirty cases of Keloid tissues were selected according to our inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as 30 normal scars, were enrolled in our study as a control group. An excisional biopsy was harvested and ELISA was done on keloid tissue and normal scar samples, with CD68, the surface marker for M1 and CD163 representing M2. The results revealed the low expression of M1 (CD68) in keloid tissue meanwhile high levels of M1 were detected in normal scars. We also detected that higher tissue expression of M2 (CD163) was significantly associated with keloid cases when compared to low M2 expression in the control group. An important finding that was discovered during our study is that the M1 and M2 are significant predictors of keloid. Every increase of 1 ng/mL in M1 decreases the risk of keloid by 0.99 while every increase of one unit in M2 increases the risk of keloid by 2.01. This study concluded that the keloid formation could be a result of an abnormal response to tissue injury where there is an excessive entry of inflammatory cells into the wound, including macrophages and that the keloid incidence might be related to a decrease in M1 and an increase in M2.

Indexed as

KeloidHumansMacrophagesCD163CD68keloidmacrophages

Identifiers

PMID35604036
PMCPMC9797913
OpenAlexW4281295019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.