Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35603988›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2022

A hierarchical model for jointly assessing ecological and anthropogenic impacts on animal demography.

Thomas V Riecke, Benjamin S Sedinger, Todd W Arnold, Dan Gibson, David N Koons, Madeleine G Lohman, Michael Schaub, Perry J Williams, James S Sedinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Drivers of population dynamics and juvenile mortality in Northwest Atlantic harp seals.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Environmental drivers of productivity explain population patterns of an Arctic-nesting bird across a half-century.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas V RieckeProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7998-5233
Benjamin S SedingerCollege of Natural Resources, University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1070-6109
Todd W ArnoldDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7920-772X
Dan GibsonDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1580-1479
David N KoonsDepartment of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, CO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6474-299X
Madeleine G LohmanProgram in Ecology, Evolution, and Conservation Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7213-8293
Michael SchaubSwiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2745-0557
Perry J WilliamsDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8439-1859
James S SedingerDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.

Funding

Colorado State UniversityDelta WaterfowlInstitute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited CanadaNational Science Foundation DEB 1252656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of sustainable harvest of animal populations is of great ecological and conservation importance. Development of formal quantitative tools to estimate and mitigate the impacts of harvest on animal populations has positively impacted conservation efforts. The vast majority of existing harvest models, however, do not simultaneously estimate ecological and harvest impacts on demographic parameters and population trends. Given that the impacts of ecological drivers are often equal to or greater than the effects of harvest, and can covary with harvest, this disconnect has the potential to lead to flawed inference. In this study, we used Bayesian hierarchical models and a 43-year capture-mark-recovery dataset from 404,241 female mallards Anas platyrhynchos released in the North American midcontinent to estimate mallard demographic parameters. Furthermore, we model the dynamics of waterfowl hunters and habitat, and the direct and indirect effects of anthropogenic and ecological processes on mallard demographic parameters. We demonstrate that density dependence, habitat conditions and harvest can simultaneously impact demographic parameters of female mallards, and discuss implications for existing and future harvest management models. Our results demonstrate the importance of controlling for multicollinearity among demographic drivers in harvest management models, and provide evidence for multiple mechanisms that lead to partial compensation of mallard harvest. We provide a novel model structure to assess these relationships that may allow for improved inference and prediction in future iterations of harvest management models across taxa.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsEcosystemAnimalsBayes TheoremDucksFemalePopulation DynamicsAnas platyrhynchosBayesiancause-specific mortalitydemographyharvesthierarchical modelmallardmulticollinearitysurvival

Identifiers

PMID35603988
PMCPMC9543922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.