Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35603778›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2022

Interspecific variation in sex-specific gustatory organs in Drosophila.

Artyom Kopp, Olga Barmina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Artyom KoppDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Olga BarminaDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.

Funding

Molecular Genetics of Evolutionary InnovationsR35GM122592 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI ARTYOM KOPP · 2017 to 2026
$4.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila males use leg gustatory bristles to discriminate between male and female cuticular pheromones as an important part of courtship behavior. In Drosophila melanogaster, several male-specific gustatory bristles are present on the anterior surface of the first tarsal segment of the prothoracic leg, in addition to a larger set of gustatory bristles found in both sexes. These bristles are thought to be specialized for pheromone detection. Here, we report the number and location of sex-specific gustatory bristles in 27 other Drosophila species. Although some species have a pattern similar to D. melanogaster, others lack anterior male-specific bristles but have many dorsal male-specific gustatory bristles instead. Some species have both anterior and dorsal male-specific bristles, while others lack sexual dimorphism entirely. In several distantly related species, the number of gustatory bristles is much greater in males than in females due to a male-specific transformation of ancestrally mechanosensory bristles to a chemosensory identity. This variation in the extent and pattern of sexual dimorphism may affect the formation and function of neuronal circuits that control Drosophila courtship and contribute to the evolution of mating behavior.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsAnimalsCourtshipDrosophilaFemaleMalePheromonesSexual Behavior, AnimalDrosophila ProteinsPheromonesDrosophila evolutiongustatory organspheromone perceptionsensory bristlessexual dimorphism

Identifiers

PMID35603778
PMCPMC9339527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.