ArticleProceedings of the North Central Section /annual section meeting. American Society for Engineering Education. North Central Section2022
Moot Court Cases: Bringing Standards to Life.
Article in Proceedings of the North Central Section /annual section meeting. American Society for Engineering Education. North Central Section, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biomedical engineering instructors teach the medical devices design theory and practice following the recommendations derived from the FDA regulations included in 21CFR820 and portraying it as less of a choice but the designer's obligation to uphold laws intended to reduce medical device design risk and protect the general public from defective goods. Although product liability cases are frequently adjudicated in a court of law, many students have only a vague notion of the link between design and product liability issues, and furthermore the important role that standards play in everyday design practice. To give real-life context for the connection between product liability and the benefits of using standards in design, we are aiming to develop moot court case studies that will offer engineering students the opportunity to investigate the viewpoint of various stakeholders and to bring arguments in support of their position. Our work-in-progress is part of a larger effort to reduce the barriers to standards adoption by engineering programs by creating a complete set of educational materials for educators based on specific case studies that foster consideration and use of standards in quality systems (ISO 13485:2016), and cyber-security in medical device design (ISO/IEEE 11073). Materials include lesson plans, content, and homework assignments that will be delivered as videos, tutorials, case study narratives, and Canvas modules. Our preliminary efforts have encouraged continuation of the development of content, though our efforts will benefit from other educator participation - this paper is a "Call to Action" for collaborators.
Identifiers
35603225PMC9122114What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.