Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35603146›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

Effect of Concomitant Use of Analgesics on Prognosis in Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ziyang Mao, Xiaohui Jia, Panpan Jiang, Qinyang Wang, Yajuan Zhang, Yanlin Li, Xiaolan Fu, Min Jiao, Lili Jiang, Zhiyan Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Life Factors and Melanoma: From the Macroscopic State to the Molecular Mechanism.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Impact of opioid analgesics on survival in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ziyang MaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaohui JiaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Panpan JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Qinyang WangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yajuan ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Yanlin LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaolan FuDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Min JiaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Lili JiangDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Zhiyan LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi'an No. 3 Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Hui GuoDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNNorthwest University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) pose new challenges beyond traditional pharmacodynamics in the context of optimizing the treatment options with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). To alleviate cancer-related pain, analgesics are of absolute vital importance as chronic medications used by cancer patients. However, the possible outcome of ICI treatment concomitant with analgesics remains unclear. Methods: Original articles describing the possible influence of analgesics use on ICI treatment published before December 1, 2021 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for objective response rate (ORR), hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CI for progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the random-effects or fixed-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the Results: A total of 11 studies involving 4,404 patients were included. The pooled OR showed that opioid use decreased the response of opioid users to ICIs compared to non-opioid users (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.37-0.65, Conclusion: The concomitant use of opioids during ICI treatment has an adverse effect on patient prognosis, while the use of NSAIDs is not significantly associated with the prognosis in patients treated with ICIs.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsAnalgesicsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHumansPrognosisAnalgesicsAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalImmune Checkpoint Inhibitorsanalgesicsdrug–drug interactionsimmune checkpoint inhibitorsmeta-analysisprognosis

Identifiers

PMID35603146
PMCPMC9120587
OpenAlexW4229025196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.