Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602919›Full record

ArticlePleura and peritoneum2022

Consensus statement for treatment protocols in pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC).

Olivia Sgarbura, Clarisse Eveno, Mohammad Alyami, Naoual Bakrin, Delia Cortes Guiral, Wim Ceelen, Xavier Delgadillo, Thanh Dellinger, Andrea Di Giorgio, Amaniel Kefleyesus and 14 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pleura and peritoneum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06784765 (Preventive Use of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06784765 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Preventive Use of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Non-Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Research Oncology and Transplantology Center, KazakhstanRan2025 to 2027Enrolled160ConditionsGastric CancerArmsIntervention Group, Control Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 20 institutions in 13 countries.

Olivia SgarburaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Cancer Institute of Montpellier, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6965-3697
Clarisse EvenoDepartment of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University of Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille, France.
Mohammad AlyamiDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.
Naoual BakrinDepartment of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Delia Cortes GuiralDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Oncology Center, King Khalid Hospital, Najran, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-2271
Wim CeelenDepartment of GI Surgery, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-4419
Xavier DelgadilloCentre Médico Chirurgical Volta, Unité Spécialisée de Chirurgie, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-6310
Thanh DellingerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
Andrea Di GiorgioPeritoneal and Retroperitoneal Surgical Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3981-1145
Amaniel KefleyesusDepartment of General Surgery & Surgical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre-Bénite, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-4041
Vladimir KhomiakovP.A. Hertsen Moscow Research Oncological Institute - Branch of the National Medical Research Center of Radiology, Moscow, Russia.
Michael Bau MortensenDepartment of Surgery, Odense Pancreas Center (OPAC) & Odense PIPAC Center (OPC), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7270-5005
Jamie MurphyAcademic Surgical Unit, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Marc PocardUniversité de Paris, INSERM, U1275 CAP Paris-Tech, Paris, France.
Marc ReymondDepartment of Surgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Manuela RobellaUnit of Surgical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO, IRCCS, Turin, Italy.
Koen P RoversDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Cancer Institute, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Jimmy SoDivision of Surgical Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
S P SomashekharDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Manipal Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Clemens TempferDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Therapy Center for Peritoneal Carcinomatosis, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Herne, Germany.
Kurt Van der SpeetenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Laurent VilleneuveLyon University 1, EA 3738 CICLY, Lyon, France.
Wei Peng YongCancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Hospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRKing Khaled Hospital · SAAgostino Gemelli University Polyclinic · ITCandiolo Cancer Institute · ITCity Of Hope National Medical Center · USGhent University Hospital · BEImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBInternational Museum of Horology · CHManipal Hospital · INNational University Cancer Institute, Singapore · SGNational University of Singapore · SGOdense University Hospital · DKP.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute · RURadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversitätsklinik Marien Hospital Herne · DEUniversité de Lille · FRUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Tübingen · DEZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Safe implementation and thorough evaluation of new treatments require prospective data monitoring and standardization of treatments. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a promising alternative for the treatment of patients with peritoneal disease with an increasing number of suggested drug regimens. The aim was to reach expert consensus on current PIPAC treatment protocols and to define the most important research topics. Methods: The expert panel included the most active PIPAC centers, organizers of PIPAC courses and principal investigators of prospective studies on PIPAC. A comprehensive literature review served as base for a two-day hybrid consensus meeting which was accompanied by a modified three-round Delphi process. Consensus bar was set at 70% for combined (strong and weak) positive or negative votes according to GRADE. Research questions were prioritized from 0 to 10 (highest importance). Results: Twenty-two out of 26 invited experts completed the entire consensus process. Consensus was reached for 10/10 final questions. The combination of doxorubicin (2.1 mg/m Conclusions: The current consensus should help to limit heterogeneity of treatment protocols but underlines the utmost importance of further research.

Indexed as

cisplatindoxorubicinoxaliplatinperitoneal metastasisPIPACstandardisationtreatment protocol

Identifiers

PMID35602919
PMCPMC9069497
OpenAlexW4214948550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.