Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602909›Full record

ArticleRiver research and applications2022

Biological assessment of western USA sandy bottom rivers based on modeling historical and current fish and macroinvertebrate data.

Robert M Hughes, Meredith Zeigler, Shann Stringer, Gordon W Linam, Joseph Flotemersch, Benjamin Jessup, Seva Joseph, Gerald Jacobi, Lynette Guevara, Robert Cook and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in River research and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bending the curve of global freshwater biodiversity loss: what are the prospects?Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Robert M HughesDepartment of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Meredith ZeiglerNew Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Shann StringerNew Mexico Energy, Minerals, and Natural Resources Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Gordon W LinamTexas Parks and Wildlife, River Studies Program, San Marcos, Texas, USA.
Joseph FlotemerschU.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Benjamin JessupTetra Tech, Montpelier, Vermont, USA.
Seva JosephNew Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Gerald JacobiNew Mexico Highlands University, Las Vegas, New Mexico, USA.
Lynette GuevaraNew Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
Robert CookU.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Region 6, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Patricia BradleyTetra Tech, Montpelier, Vermont, USA.
Kristopher BarriosNew Mexico Environment Department, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA.
New Mexico Department of Health · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USTetra Tech (United States) · USNew Mexico Highlands University · USOregon Department of Fish and Wildlife · USTexas Parks and Wildlife Department · US

Funding

EPA EP-C-17-031Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological monitoring is important for assessing the ecological condition of surface waters. However, there are challenges in determining what constitutes reference conditions, what assemblages should be used as indicators, and how assemblage data should be converted into quantitative indicator scores. In this study, we developed and applied biological condition gradient (BCG) modeling to fish and macroinvertebrate data previously collected from large, sandy bottom southwestern USA rivers. Such rivers are particularly vulnerable to altered flow regimes resulting from dams, water withdrawals and climate change. We found that sensitive ubiquitous taxa for both fish and macroinvertebrates had been replaced by more tolerant taxa, but that the condition assessment ratings based on fish and macroinvertebrate assemblages differed. We conclude that the BCG models based on both macroinvertebrate and fish assemblage condition were useful for classifying the condition of southwestern USA sandy bottom rivers. However, our fish BCG model was slightly more sensitive than the macroinvertebrate model to anthropogenic disturbance, presumably because we had historical fish data, and because fish may be more sensitive to dams and altered flow regimes than are macroinvertebrates.

Identifiers

PMID35602909
PMCPMC9115846
OpenAlexW4206416235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.