Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602688›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

What Is the Support for Conspiracy Beliefs About COVID-19 Vaccines in Latin America? A Prospective Exploratory Study in 13 Countries.

Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez, José Ventura-León, Pablo D Valencia, Lindsey W Vilca, Carlos Carbajal-León, Mario Reyes-Bossio, Michael White, Claudio Rojas-Jara, Roberto Polanco-Carrasco, Miguel Gallegos and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Tomás Caycho-RodríguezFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
José Ventura-LeónFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
Pablo D ValenciaFacultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Tlalnepantla de Baz, Mexico.
Lindsey W VilcaSouth American Center for Education and Research in Public Health, Universidad Norbert Wiener, Lima, Peru.
Carlos Carbajal-LeónFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Peru.
Mario Reyes-BossioFacultad de Psicología, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima, Peru.
Michael WhiteFacultad de Ciencias Humanas y Educación, Universidad Peruana Unión, Lima, Peru.
Claudio Rojas-JaraFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Roberto Polanco-CarrascoCuadernos de Neuropsicología, Rancagua, Chile.
Miguel GallegosFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica del Maule, Talca, Chile.
Mauricio CervigniConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Pablo MartinoConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Diego Alejandro PalaciosCentro de Desarrollo Humano, Universidad Mariano Gálvez, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Rodrigo Moreta-HerreraEscuela de Psicología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Ambato, Ecuador.
Antonio Samaniego-PinhoCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Filosofía, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Asunción, Paraguay.
Marlon Elías Lobos RiveraEscuela de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador, San Salvador, El Salvador.
Andrés Buschiazzo FigaresInstituto Alfred Adler Uruguay, Centro de Estudios Adlerianos, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Diana Ximena Puerta-CortésPrograma de Psicología, Universidad de Ibagué, Ibagué, Colombia.
Ibraín Enrique Corrales-ReyesServicio de Cirugía Maxilofacial, Hospital General Universitario Carlos Manuel de Céspedes, Universidad de Ciencias Médicas de Granma, Bayamo, Cuba.
Raymundo CalderónCarrera de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad del Valle de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
Bismarck Pinto TapiaCarrera de Psicología, Universidad Católica Boliviana San Pablo, La Paz, Bolivia.
Walter L Arias GallegosDepartamento de Psicología, Universidad Católica San Pablo, Arequipa, Peru.
Olimpia PetzoldLone Star College-Conroe Center, Conroe, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conspiracy theories about COVID-19 began to emerge immediately after the first news about the disease and threaten to prolong the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic by limiting people's willingness of receiving a life-saving vaccine. In this context, this study aimed to explore the variation of conspiracy beliefs regarding COVID-19 and the vaccine against it in 5779 people living in 13 Latin American countries (Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Mexico, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela) according to sociodemographic variables such as gender, age, educational level and source of information about COVID-19. The study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic between September 15 and October 25, 2021. The Spanish-language COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale (ECCV-COVID) and a sociodemographic survey were used. The results indicate that, in most countries, women, people with a lower educational level and those who receive information about the vaccine and COVID-19 from family/friends are more supportive of conspiracy ideas regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. In the case of age, the results vary by country. The analysis of the responses to each of the questions of the ECCV-COVID reveals that, in general, the countries evaluated are mostly in some degree of disagreement or indecision regarding conspiratorial beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. The findings could help open further study which could support prevention and treatment efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

beliefsconspiracyCOVID-19Latin Americavaccine

Identifiers

PMID35602688
PMCPMC9120924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.