Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602659›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

A comprehensive review of intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals used in ophthalmology.

Nasiq Hasan, Rohan Chawla, Nawazish Shaikh, Sindhuja Kandasamy, Shorya Vardhan Azad, M Dheepak Sundar

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noninfectious uveitis: Management with biologic agents.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Biosimilars in Adult and Pediatric Noninfectious Uveitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Incidence of diabetic retinopathy in anti-tnf treated rheumatic disease patients with type 2 diabetes.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nasiq HasanAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Rohan ChawlaAssociate Professor, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi 110029, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-4435
Nawazish ShaikhAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Sindhuja KandasamyAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Shorya Vardhan AzadAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8050-5812
M Dheepak SundarAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8065-9301
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic immunosuppressants and biologicals have been a valuable tool in the treatment of inflammatory diseases and malignancies. The safety profile of these drugs has been debatable, especially in localized systems, such as the eye. This has led to the search for fairly local approaches, such as intravitreal, subconjunctival, and topical route of administration. Immunosuppressants have been used as a second-line drug in patients intolerable to corticosteroids or those who develop multiple recurrences on weaning corticosteroids. Similarly, biologicals have also been used as the next line of therapy, when adequate control of inflammation could not be attained or immunosuppressants were contraindicated to patients. Intravitreal immunosuppressants, such as methotrexate and sirolimus, have been extensively studied in noninfectious posterior uveitis, whereas limited studies have established the efficacy of intravitreal biologicals, such as infliximab and adalimumab. Most of these drugs have shown good safety profile and tolerability in animal studies alone and have not been studied further in human subjects. However, most of the studies in literature are single-case reports or case series which limits the level of evidence. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the mechanism of action, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, indications, efficacy, and side effects of different intravitreal immunosuppressants and biologicals that have been studied in literature.

Indexed as

adalimumabcyclosporineetanerceptgolimumabinfliximabintravitrealmethotrexatenatalizumabrituximabsirolimustacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID35602659
PMCPMC9121505
OpenAlexW4282924943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.