ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022
Viscoelastic Testing in Pediatric Mechanical Circulatory Support.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monitoring unfractionated heparin in ECMO and cardiac surgery: the search for a valid reference standard.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Quantra® Viscoelastic Testing in Pediatric Trauma: A Review of Emerging Evidence and Clinical Integration.Cureus · 2025Review
- Patient Blood Management in Pediatric Patients: Current Strategies and Future PerspectivesTurkish journal of haematology : official journal of Turkish Society of Haematology · 2025Review
- Hemostasis in neonatal ECMO.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric mechanical circulatory support can be lifesaving. However, managing anticoagulation is one of the most challenging aspects of care in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support. Effective anticoagulation is even more difficult in pediatric patients due to the smaller size of their blood vessels, increased turbulent flow, and developmental hemostasis. Recently, viscoelastic testing (VET) has been used as a qualitative measure of anticoagulation efficacy in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ventricular assist devices (VAD). Thromboelastography (TEG®) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) provide a global qualitative assessment of hemostatic function from initiation of clot formation with the platelet-fibrin interaction, platelet aggregation, clot strength, and clot lysis. This review focuses on the TEG®/ROTEM® and important laboratory and patient considerations for interpretation in the ECMO and VAD population. We summarize the adult and pediatric ECMO/VAD literature regarding VET values, VET-platelet mapping, utility over standard laboratory monitoring, and association with outcome measures such as blood product utilization, bleeding, and thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.