ArticleJournal of food science and technology2022
Effect of protein enrichment on quality characteristics and glycemic index of gluten free sweet potato (
Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of quality characteristics among 20 sweet potato varieties.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Nutritional profiling and sensory characterization of gluten-free, high-protein, low glycemic index of sorghum-soy baked and fried chips.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Characterization, mathematical modeling of moisture sorption isotherms and bioactive compounds of Andean root flours.Current research in food science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of present investigation was justifying the suitability of sweet potato flour for development of gluten free spaghetti with reduced starch digestibility and to enhance protein content by fortification of whey protein concentrate (WPC) and chickpea flour (CPF) at the rate of 5%, 10%, and 15% respectively along with control. The effect of fortification in spaghetti was assessed for its glycemic index, physical, nutritional, and sensory properties. The data revealed that increase in the level of fortification of WPC and CPF resulted with increase in optimum cooking time, weight and volume without affecting cooking loss as compared to control sample. The percent increase in protein content of spaghetti fortified with WPC and CPF found as 192.20% and 150.08% respectively in comparison with control. However, spaghetti fortified with 15% CPF and 15% WPC showed lowest starch digestibility with reduced glycemic index to 59.43 and 58.73 respectively. The spaghetti fortified with 10% WPC and 10% CPF was found overall acceptable by panelists. Moreover, the fortification of spaghetti with WPC and CPF could significantly increase the protein content along with overall acceptability and functional characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.