Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602222›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2021

Development and multicenter validation of chest X-ray radiography interpretations based on natural language processing.

Yaping Zhang, Mingqian Liu, Shundong Hu, Yao Shen, Jun Lan, Beibei Jiang, Geertruida H de Bock, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Xu Chen, Xueqian Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yaping Zhang *Radiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Haining Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080 China.
Mingqian Liu *Winning Health Technology Ltd., Shouyang Rd., Lane 99, No. 9, Shanghai, 200072 China.
Shundong HuRadiology Department, Shanghai Sixth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Yishan Rd. 600, Shanghai, 200233 China.
Yao ShenDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Dongchuan Rd. 800, Shanghai, 200240 China.
Jun LanWinning Health Technology Ltd., Shouyang Rd., Lane 99, No. 9, Shanghai, 200072 China.
Beibei JiangRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Haining Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080 China.
Geertruida H de BockUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3104-4471
Rozemarijn VliegenthartUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Radiology, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Xu ChenRadiology Department, Shanghai Sixth People Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Yishan Rd. 600, Shanghai, 200233 China.
Xueqian XieRadiology Department, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Haining Rd.100, Shanghai, 200080 China.ORCID 0000-0002-6669-0097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence can assist in interpreting chest X-ray radiography (CXR) data, but large datasets require efficient image annotation. The purpose of this study is to extract CXR labels from diagnostic reports based on natural language processing, train convolutional neural networks (CNNs), and evaluate the classification performance of CNN using CXR data from multiple centers. Methods: We collected the CXR images and corresponding radiology reports of 74,082 subjects as the training dataset. The linguistic entities and relationships from unstructured radiology reports were extracted by the bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model, and a knowledge graph was constructed to represent the association between image labels of abnormal signs and the report text of CXR. Then, a 25-label classification system were built to train and test the CNN models with weakly supervised labeling. Results: In three external test cohorts of 5,996 symptomatic patients, 2,130 screening examinees, and 1,804 community clinic patients, the mean AUC of identifying 25 abnormal signs by CNN reaches 0.866 ± 0.110, 0.891 ± 0.147, and 0.796 ± 0.157, respectively. In symptomatic patients, CNN shows no significant difference with local radiologists in identifying 21 signs (p > 0.05), but is poorer for 4 signs (p < 0.05). In screening examinees, CNN shows no significant difference for 17 signs (p > 0.05), but is poorer at classifying nodules (p = 0.013). In community clinic patients, CNN shows no significant difference for 12 signs (p > 0.05), but performs better for 6 signs (p < 0.001). Conclusion: We construct and validate an effective CXR interpretation system based on natural language processing.

Indexed as

Computational biology and bioinformaticsImaging

Identifiers

PMID35602222
PMCPMC9053275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.