Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602206›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2021

Patient-derived organoids reflect the genetic profile of endometrial tumors and predict patient prognosis.

Hege F Berg, Marta Espevold Hjelmeland, Hilde Lien, Heidi Espedal, Tina Fonnes, Aashish Srivastava, Tomasz Stokowy, Elin Strand, Olivera Bozickovic, Ingunn M Stefansson and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hege F BergCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1712-6609
Marta Espevold HjelmelandCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Hilde LienCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Heidi EspedalSection of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0190-8999
Tina FonnesCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Aashish SrivastavaSection of Bioinformatics, Clinical Laboratory, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0532-3979
Tomasz StokowyGenomics Core Facility, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0017-8338
Elin StrandCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5894-8967
Olivera BozickovicCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1410-7936
Ingunn M StefanssonCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Line BjørgeCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Jone TrovikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Ingfrid S HaldorsenSection of Radiology, Department of Clinical Medicine, UiB, Bergen, Norway.
Erling A HoivikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0680-765X
Camilla KrakstadCentre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, UiB, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-8139
Haukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A major hurdle in translational endometrial cancer (EC) research is the lack of robust preclinical models that capture both inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. This has hampered the development of new treatment strategies for people with EC. Methods: EC organoids were derived from resected patient tumor tissue and expanded in a chemically defined medium. Established EC organoids were orthotopically implanted into female NSG mice. Patient tissue and corresponding models were characterized by morphological evaluation, biomarker and gene expression and by whole exome sequencing. A gene signature was defined and its prognostic value was assessed in multiple EC cohorts using Mantel-Cox (log-rank) test. Response to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel was measured in vitro and evaluated in vivo. Statistical difference between groups was calculated using paired t-test. Results: We report EC organoids established from EC patient tissue, and orthotopic organoid-based patient-derived xenograft models (O-PDXs). The EC organoids and O-PDX models mimic the tissue architecture, protein biomarker expression and genetic profile of the original tissue. Organoids show heterogenous sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy, and drug response is reproduced in vivo. The relevance of these models is further supported by the identification of an organoid-derived prognostic gene signature. This signature is validated as prognostic both in our local patient cohorts and in the TCGA endometrial cancer cohort. Conclusions: We establish robust model systems that capture both the diversity of endometrial tumors and intra-tumor heterogeneity. These models are highly relevant preclinical tools for the elucidation of the molecular pathogenesis of EC and identification of potential treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Cancer genomicsCancer modelsChemotherapyEndometrial cancer

Identifiers

PMID35602206
PMCPMC9053236
OpenAlexW3189624576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.