ArticleCommunications medicine2021
A BERT model generates diagnostically relevant semantic embeddings from pathology synopses with active learning.
Article in Communications medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole-slide imaging in hematopathology: Current state, challenges and future opportunities.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- From large language models to multimodal AI: a scoping review on the potential of generative AI in medicine.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Review
- A novel dual embedding few-shot learning approach for classifying bone loss using orthopantomogram radiographic notes.Head & face medicine · 2025Article
- Synoptic reporting by summarizing cancer pathology reports using large language models.npj health systems · 2025Article
- Computational pathology: A survey review and the way forward.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Review
- Use of n-grams and K-means clustering to classify data from free text bone marrow reports.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024Article
- Model-Agnostic Binary Patch Grouping for Bone Marrow Whole Slide Image Representation.The American journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Applications of Large Language Models in Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pathology synopses consist of semi-structured or unstructured text summarizing visual information by observing human tissue. Experts write and interpret these synopses with high domain-specific knowledge to extract tissue semantics and formulate a diagnosis in the context of ancillary testing and clinical information. The limited number of specialists available to interpret pathology synopses restricts the utility of the inherent information. Deep learning offers a tool for information extraction and automatic feature generation from complex datasets. Methods: Using an active learning approach, we developed a set of semantic labels for bone marrow aspirate pathology synopses. We then trained a transformer-based deep-learning model to map these synopses to one or more semantic labels, and extracted learned embeddings (i.e., meaningful attributes) from the model's hidden layer. Results: Here we demonstrate that with a small amount of training data, a transformer-based natural language model can extract embeddings from pathology synopses that capture diagnostically relevant information. On average, these embeddings can be used to generate semantic labels mapping patients to probable diagnostic groups with a micro-average F1 score of 0.779 Â ± 0.025. Conclusions: We provide a generalizable deep learning model and approach to unlock the semantic information inherent in pathology synopses toward improved diagnostics, biodiscovery and AI-assisted computational pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.