ArticleCommunications medicine2021
Improving personalized tumor growth predictions using a Bayesian combination of mechanistic modeling and machine learning.
Article in Communications medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early Immunological Biomarkers for Personalized Treatment Selection in Severe COVID-19: Post Hoc Machine Learning Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Identification of a personalized eGFR threshold improves the prediction of kidney failure risk after transplantation.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Early Cancer Detection: What's Going on and What's Next.MedComm · 2026Review
- From mechanistic models to artificial intelligence: exploring the potential of digital twins in geriatric oncology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Individualizing glioma radiotherapy planning by optimization of a data and physics-informed discrete loss.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response.ArXiv · 2025Article
- The impact of compression and confinement in tumor growth and progression: emerging concepts in cancer mechanobiology.Frontiers in materials · 2025Article
- Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023Review
- Functional biomaterials for biomimetic 3D in vitro tumor microenvironment modeling.In vitro models · 2023Review
- Predicting regrowth of low-grade gliomas after radiotherapy.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Data driven model discovery and interpretation for CAR T-cell killing using sparse identification and latent variables.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Roadmap on plasticity and epigenetics in cancer.Physical biology · 2022Review
- The impact of tumor associated macrophages on tumor biology under the lens of mathematical modelling: A review.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- A novel interpretable machine learning algorithm to identify optimal parameter space for cancer growth.Frontiers in big data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: In clinical practice, a plethora of medical examinations are conducted to assess the state of a patient's pathology producing a variety of clinical data. However, investigation of these data faces two major challenges. Firstly, we lack the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in regulating these data variables, and secondly, data collection is sparse in time since it relies on patient's clinical presentation. The former limits the predictive accuracy of clinical outcomes for any mechanistic model. The latter restrains any machine learning algorithm to accurately infer the corresponding disease dynamics. Methods: Here, we propose a novel method, based on the Bayesian coupling of mathematical modeling and machine learning, aiming at improving individualized predictions by addressing the aforementioned challenges. Results: We evaluate the proposed method on a synthetic dataset for brain tumor growth and analyze its performance in predicting two relevant clinical outputs. The method results in improved predictions in almost all simulated patients, especially for those with a late clinical presentation (>95% patients show improvements compared to standard mathematical modeling). In addition, we test the methodology in two additional settings dealing with real patient cohorts. In both cases, namely cancer growth in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and ovarian cancer, predictions show excellent agreement with reported clinical outcomes (around 60% reduction of mean squared error). Conclusions: We show that the combination of machine learning and mathematical modeling approaches can lead to accurate predictions of clinical outputs in the context of data sparsity and limited knowledge of disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.