Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35602187›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2021

Improving personalized tumor growth predictions using a Bayesian combination of mechanistic modeling and machine learning.

Pietro Mascheroni, Symeon Savvopoulos, Juan Carlos López Alfonso, Michael Meyer-Hermann, Haralampos Hatzikirou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of evolving cancers will require dynamic decision support.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pietro MascheroniBraunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology and Helmholtz Centre for Infectious Research, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5131-186X
Symeon SavvopoulosKU Leuven, Department of Chemical Engineering, Leuven, Belgium.
Juan Carlos López AlfonsoBraunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology and Helmholtz Centre for Infectious Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael Meyer-HermannBraunschweig Integrated Centre of Systems Biology and Helmholtz Centre for Infectious Research, Braunschweig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4300-2474
Haralampos HatzikirouMathematics Department, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ZX1308DBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 01ZX1707CVolkswagen Foundation (VolkswagenStiftung) 96732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In clinical practice, a plethora of medical examinations are conducted to assess the state of a patient's pathology producing a variety of clinical data. However, investigation of these data faces two major challenges. Firstly, we lack the knowledge of the mechanisms involved in regulating these data variables, and secondly, data collection is sparse in time since it relies on patient's clinical presentation. The former limits the predictive accuracy of clinical outcomes for any mechanistic model. The latter restrains any machine learning algorithm to accurately infer the corresponding disease dynamics. Methods: Here, we propose a novel method, based on the Bayesian coupling of mathematical modeling and machine learning, aiming at improving individualized predictions by addressing the aforementioned challenges. Results: We evaluate the proposed method on a synthetic dataset for brain tumor growth and analyze its performance in predicting two relevant clinical outputs. The method results in improved predictions in almost all simulated patients, especially for those with a late clinical presentation (>95% patients show improvements compared to standard mathematical modeling). In addition, we test the methodology in two additional settings dealing with real patient cohorts. In both cases, namely cancer growth in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and ovarian cancer, predictions show excellent agreement with reported clinical outcomes (around 60% reduction of mean squared error). Conclusions: We show that the combination of machine learning and mathematical modeling approaches can lead to accurate predictions of clinical outputs in the context of data sparsity and limited knowledge of disease mechanisms.

Indexed as

CancerComputational biology and bioinformatics

Identifiers

PMID35602187
PMCPMC9053281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.