ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022
Towards Strain-Level Complexity: Sequencing Depth Required for Comprehensive Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Analysis of the Human Gut Microbiome.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biohacking the human gut microbiome for precision health and therapeutic innovation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- The microbiome's hidden influence: preclinical insights into inflammatory responses in necrotizing enterocolitis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2025Review
- Genetic Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Disease: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Diet-Gut Microbiota Relations: Critical Appraisal of Evidence From Studies Using Metagenomics.Nutrition reviews · 2025Review
- Probing and manipulating the gut microbiome with chemistry and chemical tools.Gut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2025Review
- More than just a number: the gut microbiota and brain function across the extremes of life.Gut microbesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal bacteria strains play crucial roles in maintaining host health. Researchers have increasingly recognized the importance of strain-level analysis in metagenomic studies. Many analysis tools and several cutting-edge sequencing techniques like single cell sequencing have been proposed to decipher strains in metagenomes. However, strain-level complexity is far from being well characterized up to date. As the indicator of strain-level complexity, metagenomic single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been utilized to disentangle conspecific strains. Lots of SNP-based tools have been developed to identify strains in metagenomes. However, the sufficient sequencing depth for SNP and strain-level analysis remains unclear. We conducted ultra-deep sequencing of the human gut microbiome and constructed an unbiased framework to perform reliable SNP analysis. SNP profiles of the human gut metagenome by ultra-deep sequencing were obtained. SNPs identified from conventional and ultra-deep sequencing data were thoroughly compared and the relationship between SNP identification and sequencing depth were investigated. The results show that the commonly used shallow-depth sequencing is incapable to support a systematic metagenomic SNP discovery. In contrast, ultra-deep sequencing could detect more functionally important SNPs, which leads to reliable downstream analyses and novel discoveries. We also constructed a machine learning model to provide guidance for researchers to determine the optimal sequencing depth for their projects (SNPsnp, https://github.com/labomics/SNPsnp). To conclude, the SNP profiles based on ultra-deep sequencing data extend current knowledge on metagenomics and highlights the importance of evaluating sequencing depth before starting SNP analysis. This study provides new ideas and references for future strain-level investigations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.