Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601885›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2022

Explainable Fall Risk Prediction in Older Adults Using Gait and Geriatric Assessments.

Anup Kumar Mishra, Marjorie Skubic, Laurel A Despins, Mihail Popescu, James Keller, Marilyn Rantz, Carmen Abbott, Moein Enayati, Shradha Shalini, Steve Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anup Kumar MishraDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Marjorie SkubicDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Laurel A DespinsSinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Mihail PopescuDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
James KellerDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Marilyn RantzSinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Carmen AbbottSchool of Health Professions, Physical Therapy, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
Moein EnayatiDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Shradha ShaliniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Steve MillerSinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States.
University of Missouri · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults aged 65 and above are at higher risk of falls. Predicting fall risk early can provide caregivers time to provide interventions, which could reduce the risk, potentially avoiding a possible fall. In this paper, we present an analysis of 6-month fall risk prediction in older adults using geriatric assessments, GAITRite measurements, and fall history. The geriatric assessments included were Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), and Short Form 12 (SF12). These geriatric assessments are collected by staff nurses regularly in senior care facilities. From the GAITRite assessments on the residents, we included the Functional Ambulatory Profile (FAP) scores and gait speed to predict fall risk. We used the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) approach to explain our model predictions to understand which predictor variables contributed to increase or decrease the fall risk for an individual prediction. In case of a high fall risk prediction, predictor variables that contributed the most to elevate the risk could be further examined by the health providers for more personalized health interventions. We used the geriatric assessments, GAITRite measurements, and fall history data collected from 92 older adult residents (age = 86.2 ± 6.4, female = 57) to train machine learning models to predict 6-month fall risk. Our models predicted a 6-month fall with an AUC of 0.80 (95% CI of 0.76-0.85), sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI of 0.74-0.89), specificity of 0.72 (95% CI of 0.67-0.76), F1 score of 0.76 (95% CI of 0.72-0.79), and accuracy of 0.75 (95% CI of 0.72-0.79). These results show that our early fall risk prediction method performs well in identifying residents who are at higher fall risk, which offers care providers and family members valuable time to perform preventive actions.

Indexed as

explainable AIfall predictionfall riskgaitGAITRitegeriatric assessmentsmachine learning (ML)older adults

Identifiers

PMID35601885
PMCPMC9120414
OpenAlexW4229005170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.