ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Older Than 50 Years and Younger Than 30 Years.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Isokinetic Quadriceps and Hamstring Peak Torque in Athletes Aged 10-50+: Preoperative Uninvolved Limb Reference Values for ACL Reconstruction.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2026Article
- Patient Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale in Patients After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear: Individualized Indications for Non-Operative Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Arthroscopic debridement and antibiotic-loaded cement for treatment of chronic infected tibial tunnel post-ACL reconstruction: A case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improves Functional Scores and Quality of Life in Patients Older Than 50 Years of Age.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Tendon stem/progenitor cells are promising reparative cell sources for multiple musculoskeletal injuries of concomitant articular cartilage lesions associated with ligament injuries.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Revision Rates After Primary Allograft ACL Reconstruction by Allograft Tissue Type in Older Patients.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Few studies have compared the outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction between older patients and younger patients. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of ACL reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendon in patients >50 years and <30 years. It was hypothesized that the outcomes would be comparable between these age groups. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients >50 years (older group) or <30 years (younger group) who underwent ACL reconstruction surgery with autologous hamstring tendon between 2012 and 2015 at the authors' hospital were retrospectively enrolled in this study. All patients had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Intraoperative findings, including cartilage and meniscal injury, were recorded, and clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores. We used the paired-samples Results: A total of 67 patients and 459 patients were included in the older and younger groups, respectively. Both groups achieved significant preoperative to postoperative improvement in IKDC (older group, from 41.4 to 88.9; younger group, from 49 to 91.2), Lysholm (older group, from 49.8 to 86.1; younger group, from 50.2 to 91.8), and Tegner (older group, from 2.7 to 4.4; younger group, from 4.6 to 6.9) ( Conclusion: Comparable results after ACL reconstruction were achieved in patients >50 years compared with patients <30 years, with a high rate of return to sports activity and a low rate of complications at the 2-year follow-up. The younger group returned to a higher Tegner score, while the older group did not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.