ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Open Bristow Versus Open Latarjet for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Rugby Players: Radiological and Clinical Outcomes.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arthroscopic double-screw Latarjet versus arthroscopic button-fixed Latarjet with Bankart repair.JSES international · 2026Article
- High Rates of Return to Sport After Surgical Stabilization for Anterior Shoulder Instability in Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Review
- [Optimized Return to Sport Criteria Following the Bristow-Latarjet Procedure for Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2026Article
- Optimized Return to Sport Criteria Following the Bristow-Latarjet Procedure for Shoulder Stabilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2026Article
- Return to play and recovery metrics after arthroscopic Bankart repair with augmentations in rugby players.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2026Article
- Impact of Significant Coracoid Graft Resorption on Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure: Development and Validation of a Refined Classification System for Coracoid Bone Graft Resorption.The American journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Remodelling and the fate of bone grafts in shoulder instability surgery.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Review
- Arthroscopically assisted conjoined tendon-coracoid tip complex transfer combined with Bankart repair without screws for traumatic anterior recurrent shoulder instability: clinical and imaging outcomes.JSES international · 2025Article
- Review
- Clinical and radiographic outcomes using standard length of cannulated screws for traditional Latarjet procedure.JSES international · 2025Article
- Graft Position, Healing, and Resorption in Anterior Glenohumeral Instability: A Comparison of 4 Glenoid Augmentation Techniques.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2024Article
- Previously failed Bankart repair and the duration from first dislocation to surgery were the risk factors associated with the level of return to sports after coracoid transfer.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Article
- Association Between Preoperative Glenoid Bone Loss and Postoperative Outcomes After Coracoid Transfer Combined With Open Bankart Repair: Comparison of the Bristow and Latarjet Techniques.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Coracoid transfer is a reliable method for managing anterior shoulder instability in athletes who play contact sports; however, differences between the Bristow and Latarjet procedures are unclear. Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes and rates of bone union and bone resorption of the coracoid process between the open Bristow and open Latarjet procedures in rugby players. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Rugby players who underwent an open Bristow or an open Latarjet procedure were retrospectively reviewed for anterior shoulder instability, and 66 shoulders in the Bristow group and 35 in the Latarjet group were included. Graft union and resorption were evaluated using computed tomography at 3 months to 1 year postoperatively. Patient-reported outcome measures (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Rowe score, and satisfaction rate) were obtained at a mean follow-up of 74 months (range, 45-160 months) for Bristow and 64 months (range, 50-76 months) for Latarjet procedures. Recurrence and the rate of return to play (RTP), frequency of pain after RTP, and retirement rate after RTP were also assessed. Results: In 97.1% of the Latarjet procedure cases, bone union of the coracoid was achieved at 3 months postoperatively; however, bone union was achieved in only 72.7% of the Bristow procedure cases at 6 months postoperatively. Bone resorption of the coracoid process occurred in 6.1% of shoulders after the Bristow procedure, whereas 100% of shoulders showed bone resorption after the Latarjet procedure. No statistical differences were found in outcome scores between the 2 procedures. Subluxation and persistent pain after returning to sports were identified at a significantly higher rate in the Latarjet group (5 shoulders [14%] and 9 shoulders [26%], respectively) than in the Bristow group (2 shoulders [3%] and 2 shoulders [3%]) ( Conclusion: The Latarjet procedure had an advantage in the early and high rate of bone union but was at a disadvantage in bone resorption compared with the Bristow procedure. Subluxation and pain after returning to sports were more frequent in patients who underwent the open Latarjet procedure than in those who underwent the open Bristow procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.