ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2022
Use of a Nanofiber Resorbable Scaffold During Rotator Cuff Repair: Surgical Technique and Results After Repair of Small- to Medium-Sized Tears.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Autologous Biologic Augmentation Using Biceps Tendon Redirection and Incorporation.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Grafts in tendon repair.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Bioaugmentation of Rotator Cuff Repair With an Interpositional Nanofiber Scaffold.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Augmentation Techniques for Rotator Cuff Repairs.JBJS reviews · 2025Review
- Surgical Technique: Using an Acellular Dermal Allograft and Bioresorbable Wick Scaffold During Endoscopic Gluteus Medius and Minimus Repair.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Artificial Single-Layer, Multi-Layer, and Gradient Scaffolds for Enhancing the Healing of Tendon-to-Bone Interfaces: A Mini-Review.Orthopedic research and reviews · 2025Review
- Biomechanical enhancement in rotator cuff repairs: the impact of innovative nanofiber technology.JSES international · 2025Article
- Arthroscopic Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Repair Augmentation With Interpositional Demineralized Bone Fiber Implant.Arthroscopy techniques · 2024Article
- Functional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Materials, Methods, and Future Directions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Bioactive Patch for Rotator Cuff Repairing via Enhancing Tendon-to-Bone Healing: A Large Animal Study and Short-Term Outcome of a Clinical Trial.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Nanofiber Graft Therapy to Prevent Shoulder Stiffness and Adhesions after Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair: A Comprehensive Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Rotator Cuff Repair Augmented With Interpositional Nanofiber Scaffold.Arthroscopy techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The rate of retear after primary rotator cuff failure remains unacceptably high (up to 36% for small- to medium-sized tears). Augmentation of cuff repair with scaffold devices has been reported to improve healing after cuff repair. Purpose/Hypothesis: To describe the surgical technique of using an interpositional nanofiber scaffold during rotator cuff repair and report on a retrospective series of patients regarding functional outcomes and postoperative healing on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that augmentation of cuff repair with an interpositional scaffold would result in a high rate of tendon healing and excellent functional outcomes. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A total of 33 patients underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair augmented with a nanofiber, bioresorbable polymer patch secured as an inlay between the tendon and underlying bone. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) shoulder score, and active range of motion (ROM) measurements. Postoperative MRI was used to evaluate repair status. Results: At a minimum follow-up of 6 months, the patients showed significant improvement on SST and ASES scores ( Conclusion: Our results demonstrate the preliminary safety and efficacy of a novel, bioresorbable synthetic scaffold for rotator cuff repair. The use of the scaffold resulted in a 91% tendon healing rate and significant improvements in functional and patient-reported outcome measures. The results are promising for improving the current unacceptably high rate of rotator cuff repair failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.