ArticleHospital pharmacy2022
A Rare Pediatric Case of Cefixime Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.
Article in Hospital pharmacy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cefuroxime-induced toxic epidermal necrolysis in a 4-year-old male child: a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefixime is a third-generation cephalosporin that has been used for the treatment of a wide range of infections in children and adults. The incidence of cefixime induced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is less than 2% in adults, but it is infrequent among pediatric patients. We report a rare case of cefixime induced TEN in a 7-year-old boy. In this case, the child presented with symptoms of TEN after 2 days of administration of cefixime. This case highlights the need to select structurally different antibiotics in case of antibiotic-induced severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) to avoid recurrence of SCAR. Furthermore, concluded that irrational use of antibiotics could be disastrous as it can result in TEN as the incidence of antibiotics induced TEN ranges from 29% to 42%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.