Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601664›Full record

ArticlePopulation, space and place2022

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on internal migration in Germany: A descriptive analysis.

Nico Stawarz, Matthias Rosenbaum-Feldbrügge, Nikola Sander, Harun Sulak, Vanessa Knobloch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Population, space and place, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
38.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nico StawarzFederal Institute for Population Research (BiB) Wiesbaden Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8926-7988
Matthias Rosenbaum-FeldbrüggeFederal Institute for Population Research (BiB) Wiesbaden Germany.
Nikola SanderFederal Institute for Population Research (BiB) Wiesbaden Germany.
Harun SulakFederal Institute for Population Research (BiB) Wiesbaden Germany.
Vanessa KnoblochGerman Federal Statistical Office (Destatis) Wiesbaden Germany.
Federal Institute for Population Research · DEStatistisches Bundesamt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected economies, labor markets, health care, education and tourism around the globe in unprecedented ways. However, little research has yet been devoted to the impact that the pandemic might have had on internal migration. This study aims to address this gap by determining how the intensity and spatial patterns of internal migration changed between 2019 and 2020 in Germany. We draw on data from the population register on annual flows between 401 counties. We find that the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a 5% drop in the intensity of inter-county migration in 2020 compared to the previous year, with significant variation across age. The pandemic was also associated with an upsurge in net migration losses for the largest cities, driven by fewer inflows of young adults and continuing outflows of families.

Indexed as

COVID‐19Germanyinternal migrationsuburbanizationurbanization

Identifiers

PMID35601664
PMCPMC9110994
OpenAlexW4221123793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.