ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2022
Cataract extraction after inadvertent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in a phakic eye.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Complication after inadvertent Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in a phakic eye.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inadvertent neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG) capsulotomies are rare, with only one incident reported in the literature prior to the present case. We discuss the management of a phakic patient with a dense posterior subcapsular cataract who underwent yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) capsulotomy for presumed posterior capsular opacification. Operative course involved cataract surgery with anterior vitrectomy for prolapsed lens fragments due to the disrupted posterior capsule. This patient experienced excellent visual outcomes postoperatively, with ultimate best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20. This case underscores the importance of thorough preoperative time out, including confirmation of patient's understanding of the intended procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.