Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601607›Full record

ReviewCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases2022

Distribution and prevalence of ticks and tick-borne pathogens of wild animals in South Africa: A systematic review.

Maphuti B Ledwaba, Khumalo Nozipho, Danisile Tembe, ThankGod E Onyiche, Mamohale E Chaisi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecological review of AfrotropicalCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maphuti B LedwabaFoundational Research and Services, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Khumalo NoziphoFoundational Research and Services, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.
Danisile TembeSchool of Life Sciences, College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa.
ThankGod E OnyicheDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, University of Maiduguri, P. M. B. 1069, Maiduguri 600230, Nigeria.
Mamohale E ChaisiFoundational Research and Services, South African National Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 754, Pretoria 0001, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ticks are significant ectoparasites of animals and humans. Published data indicate that most vectors that transmit livestock and human pathogens in sub-Saharan Africa, are native to the region and originate from wild animals. Currently, there is a paucity of information on the role of wild animals on the epidemiology of zoonotic tick-borne pathogens in South Africa. This systematic review focuses on the distribution of ticks and prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in different wild animals in South Africa to identify potential reservoir hosts and possible hotspots for emergence of novel tick-borne pathogens. Following several screening processes, 38 peer-reviewed studies published from 1970 to 2021, were deemed eligible. The studies reported on ticks collected from 63 host species of 21 host families, mostly Canidae, Felidae, Bovidae and Muridae. A total of 49 tick species of nine genera, i.e.

Indexed as

PrevalenceSouth AfricaTick-borne pathogensTicksWild animals

Identifiers

PMID35601607
PMCPMC9114622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.