ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2022
A Large Squamous Cell Carcinoma on the Face Treated with Wide Excision and Defect Closure Using Forehead Flap Reconstruction.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Site- and Size-Based Algorithm for Reconstruction of Cheek Skin Defects: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Novel Reconstruction Approach After Skin Cancer Ablation Using Lateral Arm Free Flap: A Serial Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a non-melanoma skin cancer, with a rising worldwide incidence. Wide excision with an intraoperative frozen section decreases its recurrence rate and metastases. Case: We reported an SCC case in a 50-year-old woman with clinical manifestations of a 4 × 6 × 0.3 cm solitary ulcer that easily bled. Dermoscopy and histopathological examination support the diagnosis of SCC. Due to its size, a wide excision was initiated, followed by a frozen section being carried out to determine the cancer cell-free margin. We performed an additional 1 cm margin excision as residual tumor still remained in the margin on the first excision. The forehead interpolation flap reconstruction was performed right after the excision to cover the extensive defects on the cheek, followed by a full-thickness skin graft (FTSG) for the forehead. The patient recovered well without complication within eight weeks post-procedure. Discussion: SCC with a diameter larger than 2 cm is considered as high-risk, and a wide excision is the standard treatment in this condition. However, this may risk incomplete excision, leaving residual tumor and increased recurrence rate. Intraoperative frozen section aids the surgeon to determine tumor margin, thus improving the success rate of therapy by up to 95%. A skin graft on the cheek was avoided due to concerns of wound contraction, which may lead to lower tissue survival rates with poor color and texture matching. Therefore, we preferred a skin flap to increase tissue survival and preserve facial contour as well as skin color. Forehead interpolation flap was carried out as it could cover the large size of the skin defect. The forehead skin as donor was later closed by a FTSG. Conclusion: Wide excision surgery with frozen sections is the best option for managing large SCC while a skin flap is preferred to close defects on the cheek.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.