Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Factors Limiting the Appropriate Use of Rabies Post-exposure Prophylaxis by Health Professionals in Brazil.

Ramiro M da Silva, Jane Megid, Katie Hampson, Aline Alves Scarpellini Campos, Cintia S Higashi, Fabíola S Medeiros, Alexandra S Pereira, Julio A Benavides

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 62% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Rabies post-exposure prophylaxis in India: a SWOT analysis.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Ramiro M da SilvaDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Jane MegidDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Katie HampsonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Aline Alves Scarpellini CamposPrograma Estadual de Controle e Profilaxia da Raiva, State Department of Health of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cintia S HigashiCoordenação de Promoção à Saúde, State Department of Health of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Fabíola S MedeirosCoordenação de Promoção à Saúde, State Department of Health of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.
Alexandra S PereiraDiretoria de Vigilância Epidemiológica, State Department of Health of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Julio A BenavidesDepartment of Veterinary Hygiene and Public Health, São Paulo State University, Botucatu, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRMaladies Infectieuses et Vecteurs: Écologie, Génétique, Évolution et Contrôle · FRUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is necessary to prevent the fatal onset of rabies but requires optimization to avoid overuse in populations at risk of rabies. In Brazil, the incidence of dog bites remains high, with almost half of dog-bite patients not receiving the PEP recommended by the Ministry of Health guidelines between 2008 and 2017. In this study, we aimed to identify the factors that limit the appropriate prescribing of PEP by interviewing health professionals responsible for PEP administration and completion of the 'Information System on Diseases of Compulsory Declaration' (SINAN) form reporting human anti-rabies care for patients seeking health care after a dog bite. We conducted 147 questionnaires (45 questions each) in three Brazilian states (i.e., Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Rio Grande do Norte) including questions related to the criteria used by professionals to classify a dog as "suspect" or "rabid", knowledge on PEP prescription guidelines, SINAN and communication with veterinarians. Our analyses showed that most health professionals delivering PEP in these three states struggle to identify a rabies "suspect" dog according to the Ministry of Health guidelines, and to indicate the adequate PEP regimen, with only 11% of professionals prescribing the appropriate PEP under various dog-bite patient scenarios. PEP knowledge score was higher among professionals trained on PEP guidelines and working in facilities with the highest incidence of dog bites. In contrast, PEP knowledge scores did not vary significantly between states, and were not correlated to the professional's level of experience, the number of colleagues available at the health unit or the professional's confidence on prescribing appropriate PEP. Our results suggest that knowledge gaps in PEP administration among health professionals of Brazil can be reduced by implementing training programs to differentiate among rabies risk scenarios, prescribe the corresponding appropriate PEP and improve communication between health and veterinary authorities.

Indexed as

bitesdogsLatin AmericaOne HealthPEPquestionnairessurveillance

Identifiers

PMID35601400
PMCPMC9120864
OpenAlexW4229053243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.