Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601313›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Multiaspect Examinations of Possible Alternative Mappings of Identified Variant Peptides: A Case Study on the HEK293 Cell Line.

Wai-Kok Choong, Ting-Yi Sung

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wai-Kok ChoongInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-6865
Ting-Yi SungInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6028-0409
Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adopting proteogenomics approach to validate single nucleotide variation events by identifying corresponding single amino acid variant peptides from mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data facilitates translational and clinical research. Although variant peptides are usually identified from MS data with a stringent false discovery rate (FDR), FDR control could fail to eliminate dubious results caused by several issues; thus, postexamination to eliminate dubious results is required. However, comprehensive postexaminations of identification results are still lacking. Therefore, we propose a framework of three bottom-up levels, peptide-spectrum match, peptide, and variant event levels, that consists of rigorous 11-aspect examinations from the MS perspective to further confirm the reliability of variant events. As a proof of concept and showing feasibility, we demonstrate 11 examinations on the identified variant peptides from an HEK293 cell line data set, where various database search strategies were applied to maximize the number of identified variant PSMs with an FDR <1% for postexaminations. The results showed that only FDR criterion is insufficient to validate identified variant peptides and the 11 postexaminations can reveal low-confidence variant events detected by shotgun proteomics experiments. Therefore, we suggest that postexaminations of identified variant events based on the proposed framework are necessary for proteogenomics studies.

Identifiers

PMID35601313
PMCPMC9118379
OpenAlexW4225323833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.