ArticleACS omega2022
Multiaspect Examinations of Possible Alternative Mappings of Identified Variant Peptides: A Case Study on the HEK293 Cell Line.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- PgxSAVy: A tool for comprehensive evaluation of variant peptide quality in proteogenomics - catching the (un)usual suspects.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adopting proteogenomics approach to validate single nucleotide variation events by identifying corresponding single amino acid variant peptides from mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics data facilitates translational and clinical research. Although variant peptides are usually identified from MS data with a stringent false discovery rate (FDR), FDR control could fail to eliminate dubious results caused by several issues; thus, postexamination to eliminate dubious results is required. However, comprehensive postexaminations of identification results are still lacking. Therefore, we propose a framework of three bottom-up levels, peptide-spectrum match, peptide, and variant event levels, that consists of rigorous 11-aspect examinations from the MS perspective to further confirm the reliability of variant events. As a proof of concept and showing feasibility, we demonstrate 11 examinations on the identified variant peptides from an HEK293 cell line data set, where various database search strategies were applied to maximize the number of identified variant PSMs with an FDR <1% for postexaminations. The results showed that only FDR criterion is insufficient to validate identified variant peptides and the 11 postexaminations can reveal low-confidence variant events detected by shotgun proteomics experiments. Therefore, we suggest that postexaminations of identified variant events based on the proposed framework are necessary for proteogenomics studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.