Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601278›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2021

Usefulness of articulating laparoscopic instruments during laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma.

Eunju Lee, Kanghaeng Lee, So Hyun Kang, Sangjun Lee, Yongjoon Won, Young Suk Park, Sang-Hoon Ahn, Yun-Suhk Suh, Hyung-Ho Kim

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06050161 (Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Utilizing the Artisential Articulating Laparoscopic Instruments), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06050161 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery Utilizing the Artisential Articulating Laparoscopic Instruments

TypeinterventionalSponsorKern Medical CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled50ConditionsPelvic Organ Prolapse, Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Mesh Augmentation, Laparoscopic SurgeryArmsArticulating laparoscopic instrument, Conventional laparoscopic instrument, Robotic surgical instrument
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ArtiSentialAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Early experience with the ARTISENTIALTechniques in coloproctology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eunju LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2168-6534
Kanghaeng LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-2781
So Hyun KangDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-9043
Sangjun LeeDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-0254
Yongjoon WonDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-288X
Young Suk ParkDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-9759
Sang-Hoon AhnDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-3625
Yun-Suhk SuhDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-8482
Hyung-Ho KimDepartment of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8916-0048

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Conventional straight-shaped laparoscopic surgical instruments have limitations that, unlike robotic surgery, the wrist joint cannot be used. This study aimed to analyze the short-term safety and feasibility of ArtiSential (Livsmed), a new articulating laparoscopic instrument, which obviates the limitations of conventional laparoscopic surgery and allows the wrist joint to be used freely over 360° as in robotic surgery. Methods: The study included patients who underwent conventional laparoscopy or laparoscopy with the ArtiSential instrument. Patients who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy for primary gastric adenocarcinoma in our institution were retrospectively reviewed. The groups were propensity score matched in a 11 ratio. Primary endpoint was incidence of early postoperative complication (postoperative 30-day morbidity and mortality) and secondary endpoints were operative outcomes. Results: A total of 327 patients (147 of the conventional group and 180 of the ArtiSential group) were propensity score matched. After propensity score matching was performed, each group comprised of 122 patients. Both groups were comparable with regard to operation time, estimated blood loss, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and length of hospital stay. The ArtiSential group had a faster time to a fluid diet (2.6 ± 1.3 days vs. 2.3 ± 0.6 days, Conclusion: The current study showed that the use of ArtiSential is a safe and feasible option without increasing operation time, length of hospital stay, and intraoperative bleeding.

Indexed as

ArticulationGastrectomyLaparoscopyStomach neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35601278
PMCPMC8966001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.