Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601207›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics

Does the femoral neck system provide better outcomes compared to cannulated screws fixation for the management of femoral neck fracture in young adults? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Amit Srivastava, Pratik M Rathod, Rehan Ul Haq, Sameer Aggarwal, Prasoon Kumar, Ish Kumar Dhammi, Ankit Dadra

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Comparable results for the Femoral Neck System and three-screw fixation in femoral neck fracture treatment.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Short-term effectiveness of robot-guided femoral neck system combined with cannulated compression screw fixation in treatment of femoral neck fracture in young and middle-aged patients].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Low reoperation rate after fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures with the femoral neck system (FNS).European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rajesh Kumar RajnishDepartment of Orthopedics, Adesh Medical College and Hospital, Shahabad, Haryana, India.
Amit SrivastavaDepartment of Orthopedics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Pratik M RathodDepartment of Orthopedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Rehan Ul HaqHead of the Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, India.
Sameer AggarwalDepartment of Orthopedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Prasoon KumarDepartment of Orthopedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Ish Kumar DhammiDepartment of Orthopedics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Ankit DadraDepartment of Orthopedics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INUniversity College of Medical Sciences · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhopal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Management of neck of femur fractures depend upon the age of presentation and it ranges from internal fixation to arthroplasty. In a relatively young population, anatomical reduction with stable internal fixation is the preferred treatment modality; the choice of implants available are multiple cannulated cancellous screws, dynamic hip screws, and the newly devised femoral neck system. The fracture configuration and pattern dictate the ideal implant to be utilized, with the femoral neck system documented to be apt for all the fracture types, while the cannulated screws are deemed better for stable fractures. Methods: A primary electronic search was conducted on databases of Medline, Scopus, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Embase, to look for articles published between 1 Results: 6 retrospective studies with 371 patients (224 males,147 females) (164: FNS; 207: CCS) were included. Our analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in terms of duration of surgery, incision length, and length of hospital stay, there was more blood loss in FNS, but less fluoroscopy time. The fracture union time was lesser for the FNS group and also the femoral shortening was lesser in it. There was no difference in terms of complications, pain relief, and functional outcomes. Conclusion: Femoral neck system is a new and effective implant for femoral neck fractures in the young with faster union rates and lesser neck shortening through an incision similar to the conventional multiple cancellous screws. It has additional advantages of lesser fluoroscopy exposure to the patient and the OT personnel. However, the rates of complications like implant failure, non-unions, and avascular necrosis are similar to the cannulated screws and either of the implants do not offer any advantage in the final functional status and pain relief to the patient over each other.

Indexed as

Cannulated cancellous screwsFemoral neck fracturesFemoral neck systemInternal fixation

Identifiers

PMID35601207
PMCPMC9118353
OpenAlexW4280569082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.