Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601202›Full record

ArticleFamily court review2022

Lessons for a COVID-19 era: Barriers and facilitators to court ordered online parenting programs for divorcing and separating parents.

Claire S Tomlinson, Brittany N Rudd, Amy G Applegate, Anjolii Diaz, Amy Holtzworth-Munroe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family court review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire S TomlinsonDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences Indiana University Bloomington Indiana USA.
Brittany N RuddInstitute for Juvenile Research, Department of Psychiatry University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago Illinois USA.
Amy G ApplegateIndiana University Maurer School of Law Bloomington Indiana USA.
Anjolii DiazBall State University Muncie Indiana USA.
Amy Holtzworth-MunroeDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences Indiana University Bloomington Indiana USA.
Indiana University Bloomington · USBall State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Family courts are increasingly interested in online parenting programs for divorcing and separating parents, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. To our knowledge, no previous study has evaluated the barriers to and facilitators of parent participation in these programs for family law cases. We interviewed 61 parents in the midst of family law cases regarding their perspectives. While many parents viewed online parent programs positively (e.g., convenient), they also reported barriers to participation (e.g., technology problems). We offer recommendations (e.g., communication about program benefits) to support courts as they decide whether to continue ordering online parent programs following the pandemic.

Indexed as

court‐ordered program access facilitators and barriersCOVID‐19divorce and parental separationonline parenting programsparent perceptions of online programsqualitative interview

Identifiers

PMID35601202
PMCPMC9111673
OpenAlexW4220802057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.