Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601175›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of ophthalmology2022

Inflammation and dry eye disease-where are we?

Srinivas K Rao, Rishi Mohan, Nikhil Gokhale, Himanshu Matalia, Paras Mehta

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Imaging Approaches for the Diagnosis of Dry Eye: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Translating Biomarker Discovery: From Bench to Bedside in Dry Eye Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Oral Intake ofBiomedicines · 2025
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Srinivas K RaoDarshan Eye Care & Surgical Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600040, India.
Rishi MohanMM Eyetech Institute of Ophthalmology, New Delhi 110024, India.
Nikhil GokhaleGokhale Eye Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400028, India.
Himanshu MataliaNarayana Nethralaya, Electronic City, Bangalore 560001, Karnataka, India.
Paras MehtaSameep Eye Hospital and Corneal Center, Vadodara 390006, Gujarat, India.
Aditya Jyot Eye Hospital · INVasan Eye Care Hospital · INNarayana Nethralaya · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of inflammation in dry eye disease (DED) results in increased patient symptomatology, ocular surface damage and worsening tear dysfunction. It also affects the health of meibomian glands and their secretions which further aggravates ocular surface disease. This article reviews current knowledge regarding ocular surface inflammation in DED and explores the relationships between the vicious cycles of DED, inflammation and meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD). The clinical evaluation of eyes with such changes, markers that identify the presence of inflammation on the ocular surface and current treatment options are discussed.

Indexed as

dry eye diseaseinflammationmeibomian gland dysfunctionocular surface diseasevicious cycle

Identifiers

PMID35601175
PMCPMC9091897
OpenAlexW4285745294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.