ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2022
Comparison of clinical outcome of small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty and FS-LASIK for correction of moderate and high hyperopia.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preservation and Reuse of KLEx Lenticules: From Biobanking to Therapeutic and Refractive Innovations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Effects of different side-cut angles on ocular surface recovery after FS-LASIK.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Applications of SMILE-extracted lenticules in ophthalmology.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024Review
- Visual outcomes and corneal densitometry after allogenic and autologous lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty for the correction of moderate-to-high hyperopia.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Allogenic Lenticular Implantation for Correction of Refractive Error and Ectasia: Narrative Review.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the clinical outcome of small-incision lenticule intrastromal keratoplasty (sLIKE) and femtosecond laser-assisted
methodsA case-controlled clinical study was performed. Twenty right eyes of 20 moderate and high hyperopia patients underwent sLIKE (sLIKE group) and 22 right eyes of 22 moderate and high hyperopia patients underwent FS-LASIK (FS-LASIK group) were enrolled in this study from October 2015 to October 2017. Visual acuity, refractive error, corneal thickness, and keratometry were compared between the groups before and 1y postoperatively.
resultsThe postoperative uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) and uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) were improved in the two groups. The UNVA reached J1 in 15 eyes (75.0%) in the sLIKE group and 5 eyes (22.7%) in the FS-LASIK group 1y after surgery (
conclusionsLIKE has better visual and refractive outcome than FS-LASIK for correction of moderate and high hyperopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.