ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2022
Neuroretinal dysfunction in patients affected by neurofibromatosis type 1.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uveal and retinal abnormalities in an Asian neurofibromatosis type 1 cohort: a cross-sectional study with age-stratified analysis.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- Key features of choroidal abnormalities in neurofibromatosis type 1, a commentary on "Histologic correlates of "choroidal abnormalities" in neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)".Acta neuropathologica · 2024Article
- Insights into Novel Choroidal and Retinal Clinical Signs in Neurofibromatosis Type 1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identifying a novel frameshift pathogenic variant in a Chinese family with neurofibromatosis type 1 and review of literature.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo examine neuroretinal function by using the multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) test in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) without optic pathway gliomas (OPGs).
methodsThis study was conducted on 35 patients (35 eyes) with NF1 and 30 healthy subjects (30 eyes) for the control group. Each subject underwent a complete ophthalmological examination including spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and mfERG. The 1.5-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of the brain was performed in NF1 patients to assess the presence of OPGs. All participants were recruited having a best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of no less than 20/20 in each eye. The amplitude and implicit time of the P1 wave (first-order Kernel component) were evaluated on mfERG. Data analysis was carried out in the two central degrees and in the four quadrants from two to 25 degrees of visual field.
resultsStatistically significant results were obtained for the P1 wave amplitudes in the 4 quadrants in NF1 patients compared to healthy controls, while the reduction was not significant in the 2 central degrees between the groups. A statistically significant difference was observed among the P1 wave amplitudes as recorded in the 4 quadrants within the NF1 group, with lower amplitudes detected in the nasal quadrants. No differences in the implicit times were recorded in the 2 central degrees and in the 4 quadrants as compared between NF1 patients and controls.
conclusionImpaired neuroretinal function in NF1 patients is expressed in a decreased amplitude of the P1-wave between 2 and 25 central retinal degrees on mfERG. Altered intracellular signal transduction due to abnormal neurofibromin-mediated cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) generation, can be involved. The possible use of mfERG as subclinical retinal damage indicator has a potential utility in clinical practice for the follow-up of NF1 patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.