Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601137›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2022

Predicting lying, sitting and walking at different intensities using smartphone accelerometers at three different wear locations: hands, pant pockets, backpack.

Seyed Javad Khataeipour, Javad Rahimipour Anaraki, Arastoo Bozorgi, Machel Rayner, Fabien A Basset, Daniel Fuller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seyed Javad KhataeipourDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Javad Rahimipour AnarakiInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Arastoo BozorgiDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Machel RaynerSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Fabien A BassetSchool of Human Kinetics and Recreation, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Daniel FullerDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2015-2955
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study uses machine learning (ML) to develop methods for estimating activity type/intensity using smartphones, to evaluate the accuracy of these models for classifying activity, and to evaluate differences in accuracy between three different wear locations. Method: Forty-eight participants were recruited to complete a series of activities while carrying Samsung phones in three different locations: backpack, right hand and right pocket. They were asked to sit, lie down, walk and run three Metabolic Equivalent Task (METs), five METs and at seven METs. Raw accelerometer data were collected. We used the R, activity counts package, to calculate activity counts and generated new features based on the raw accelerometer data. We evaluated and compared several ML algorithms; Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, Linear Discriminant Analysis and k-Nearest Neighbours using the caret package (V.6.0-86). Using the combination of the raw accelerometer data and the computed features leads to high model accuracy. Results: Using raw accelerometer data, RF models achieved an accuracy of 92.90% for the right pocket location, 89% for the right hand location and 90.8% for the backpack location. Using activity counts, RF models achieved an accuracy of 51.4% for the right pocket location, 48.5% for the right hand location and 52.1% for the backpack location. Conclusion: Our results suggest that using smartphones to measure physical activity is accurate for estimating activity type/intensity and ML methods, such as RF with feature engineering techniques can accurately classify physical activity intensity levels in laboratory settings.

Indexed as

Keywords

Identifiers

PMID35601137
PMCPMC9086604
OpenAlexW4281393173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.