Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601122›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2022

Utility and safety of the self-expandable metallic colonic stent in Japanese patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative treatment for obstructive primary advanced colorectal cancer: A retrospective single-center medical chart evaluation.

Naomi Naruse, Koichi Miyahara, Yasuhisa Sakata, Ayako Takamori, Yoichiro Ito, Hidenori Hidaka, Ryuichiro Sameshima, Nanae Tsuruoka, Ryo Shimoda, Kohei Yamanouchi and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naomi NaruseDepartment of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Koichi MiyaharaDepartment of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Yasuhisa SakataDepartment of Internal Medicine Saga University Hospital Saga Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5345-3770
Ayako TakamoriDivision of Clinical Research Center Saga University Hospital Saga Japan.
Yoichiro ItoDepartment of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Hidenori HidakaDepartment of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Ryuichiro SameshimaDepartment of Surgery Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Nanae TsuruokaDepartment of Internal Medicine Saga University Hospital Saga Japan.
Ryo ShimodaDepartment of Internal Medicine Saga University Hospital Saga Japan.
Kohei YamanouchiDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences International University of Health and Welfare Fukuoka Japan.
Takahiro NodaDepartment of Internal Medicine Karatsu Red Cross Hospital Karatsu Japan.
Kazuma FujimotoDepartment of Clinical Medical Sciences International University of Health and Welfare Fukuoka Japan.
Motohiro EsakiDepartment of Internal Medicine Saga University Hospital Saga Japan.
Saga University · JPTakamatsu Red Cross Hospital · JPFukuoka International University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aim: The present study aimed to compare the utility and safety of the colonic self-expandable metallic stent between patients with obstructive primary colorectal cancer who underwent chemotherapy or palliative treatment care and patients bridging for surgery. Methods: The cases of 71 patients with colonic obstructive stenosis and in-dwelling stents who were hospitalized between May 2012 and April 2020 at Karatsu Red Cross Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were classified into three groups: bridging for curative surgery (group I), receiving systemic chemotherapy (group II-A), and receiving only palliative treatment (group II-B). Technical and clinical success rates and complication rates after stenting were evaluated. Results: No significant differences were observed in the technical (procedure) success rates (group I: 100%; group II, 97.6% [II-A: 100%; II-B: 95.8%]). The total clinical success rate was 85.9% (61/71) and did not vary significantly among the groups (group I: 82.8%; group II 88.0% [II-A: 83.3%; II-B: 91.6%]). No significant differences were observed in the early complication rates between groups I and II and in the late complication rates between groups II-A and II-B. Nutrition status, general condition, tumor staging, and 1-year survival were poorer in group II than in group I. Conclusion: The findings show that colonic stenting for malignant obstruction was performed successfully and safely both in patients who received systemic chemotherapy or palliative therapy and in patients bridging for curative surgery, regardless of risk status for malnutrition, poor general condition, cancer stage progression, and short survival.

Indexed as

chemotherapycolonic self‐expandable metallic stentcolonoscopycolorectal cancersurgery

Identifiers

PMID35601122
PMCPMC9120876
OpenAlexW4225154827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.