Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35601007›Full record

ArticleAmerican anthropologist2022

Belief correlations with parental vaccine hesitancy: Results from a national survey.

Luke J Matthews, Sarah A Nowak, Courtney C Gidengil, Christine Chen, Joseph M Stubbersfield, Jamshid J Tehrani, Andrew M Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American anthropologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luke J MatthewsRAND Corporation Boston MA 02116 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-1007
Sarah A NowakDepartment of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine University of Vermont Burlington VT 05405 USA.
Courtney C GidengilRAND Corporation Boston MA 02116 USA.
Christine ChenRAND Corporation Santa Monica CA 90401 USA.
Joseph M StubbersfieldDepartment of Anthropology Durham University UK.
Jamshid J TehraniDepartment of Anthropology Durham University UK.
Andrew M ParkerRAND Corporation Pittsburgh PA 15213 USA.

Funding

Vaccine Beliefs and Decision MakingR21HD087749 · NICHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI MATTHEWS, LUKE · 2017 to 2018
$482k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD087749
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a nationally representative survey of parents' beliefs and self-reported behaviors regarding childhood vaccinations. Using Bayesian selection among multivariate models, we found that beliefs, even those without any vaccine or health content, predicted vaccine-hesitant behaviors better than demographics, social network effects, or scientific reasoning. The multivariate structure of beliefs combined many types of ideation that included concerns about both conspiracies and side effects. Although they are not strongly related to vaccine-hesitant behavior, demographics were key predictors of beliefs. Our results support some of the previously proposed pro-vaccination messaging strategies and suggest some new strategies not previously considered.

Indexed as

Bayesiancumulative culturesurveyvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35601007
PMCPMC9111381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.