ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2022
Using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis to Identify Increased MND1 Expression as a Predictor of Poor Breast Cancer Survival.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- MND1 reduces breast cancer chemosensitivity by promoting RAD51-mediated homologous recombination repair.Cell death & disease · 2026Article
- O-GlcNAcylation regulates the DNA damage repair function of MND1 in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- From Cell Lines to Patients: Dissecting the Proteomic Landscape of Exosomes in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- MND1 Promotes the Proliferation of Prostate Cancer CellCurrent cancer drug targets · 2025Article
- Integrative Pan-Cancer Analysis Reveals the Oncogenic Role of MND1 and Validation of MND1's Role in Breast Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- FOXA1/MND1/TKT axis regulates gastric cancer progression and oxaliplatin sensitivity via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.Cancer cell international · 2023Article
- Identification of SNP markers for canine mammary gland tumours in females based on a genome-wide association study - preliminary results.Journal of veterinary research · 2023Article
- GNPNAT1 promotes the stemness of breast cancer and serves as a potential prognostic biomarker.Oncology reports · 2023Article
- Screening of novel biomarkers for breast cancer based on WGCNA and multiple machine learning algorithms.Translational cancer research · 2023Article
- High Expression of DNTTIP1 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Validation of a Disease-Free Survival Prediction Model Using UBE2C and Clinical Indicators in Breast Cancer Patients.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We used bioinformatics analysis to identify potential biomarker genes and their relationship with breast cancer (BC). Materials and Methods: We used a weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to create a co-expression network based on the top 25% genes in the GSE24124, GSE33926, and GSE86166 datasets obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus. We used the DAVID online platform to perform GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses and the Cytoscape CytoHubba plug-in to screen the potential genes. Then, we related the genes to prognostic values in BC using the Oncomine, GEPIA, and Kaplan-Meier Plotter databases. Findings were validated by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the Human Protein Atlas and the TCGA-BRCA cohort. LinkedOmics identified the interactive expressions of hub genes. We used UALCAN to evaluate the methylation levels of these hub genes. MethSurv and SurvivalMeth were used to assess the multilevel prognostic value. Finally, we assessed hub gene association with immune cell infiltration using TIMER. Results: The mRNA levels of MKI67, UBE2C, GTSE1, CCNA2, and MND1 were significantly upregulated in BC, whereas ESR1, THSD4, TFF1, AGR2, and FOXA1 were significantly downregulated. The DNA methylation signature analysis showed a better prognosis in the low-risk group. Further subgroup analyses revealed that MND1 might serve as an independent risk factor for unfavorable BC prognosis. Additionally, MND1 expression levels positively correlate with the immune infiltration statuses of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and macrophages. Conclusion: Our results indicate that the ten hub genes may be involved in BC's carcinogenesis, development, or metastasis, and MND1 may be a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.