Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600976›Full record

ArticleBioactive materials2023

A non-invasive smart scaffold for bone repair and monitoring.

Yazhuo Huang, Lingyu Zhang, Yongrong Ji, Hongpei Deng, Mingce Long, Shengfang Ge, Yanjie Su, Siew Yin Chan, Xian Jun Loh, Ai Zhuang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioactive materials, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Research progress of electroactivity graphene-based materials in bone repair].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  3. Application and prospects of nanomaterials in osteoporosis treatment.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yazhuo HuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Lingyu ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yongrong JiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Hongpei DengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Mingce LongKey Laboratory of Thin Film and Microfabrication Technology (Ministry of Education), School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Shengfang GeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Yanjie SuKey Laboratory of Thin Film and Microfabrication (Ministry of Education), Department of Micro/Nano Electronics, School of Electronics, Information and Electrical Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Siew Yin ChanInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, #08-03, Singapore, 138634, Singapore.
Xian Jun LohInstitute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (ASTAR), 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis, #08-03, Singapore, 138634, Singapore.
Ai ZhuangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Jing RuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital · CNAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing strategies for bone defect repair are difficult to monitor. Smart scaffold materials that can quantify the efficiency of new bone formation are important for bone regeneration and monitoring. Carbon nanotubes (CNT) have promising bioactivity and electrical conductivity. In this study, a noninvasive and intelligent monitoring scaffold was prepared for bone regeneration and monitoring by integrating carboxylated CNT into chemically cross-linked carboxymethyl chitosan hydrogel. CNT scaffold (0.5% w/v) demonstrated improved mechanical properties with good biocompatibility and electrochemical responsiveness. Cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of CNT scaffold responded sensitively to seed cell differentiation degree in both cellular and animal levels. Interestingly, the CNT scaffold could make up the easy deactivation shortfall of bone morphogenetic protein 2 by sustainably enhancing stem cell osteogenic differentiation and new bone tissue formation through CNT roles. This research provides new ideas for the development of noninvasive and electrochemically responsive bioactive scaffolds, marking an important step in the development of intelligent tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Carbon nanotubeElectrochemical responseNoninvasive monitoringOsteogenesisTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35600976
PMCPMC9097555
OpenAlexW4229046526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.