ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022
Information Extraction from the Text Data on Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review on Tasks, Challenges, and Methods from 2010 to 2021.
Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Data extraction methods for systematic review (semi)automation: Update of a living systematic review.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- A framework for normalized extraction of fine-grained traditional Chinese medicine symptom entities and relations.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- TCMKD: From ancient wisdom to modern insights-A comprehensive platform for traditional Chinese medicine knowledge discovery.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Article
- Efficient evidence selection for systematic reviews in traditional Chinese medicine.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Data mining historical Chinese medical recipe collections and nuclear receptor profiling identify plant fractions that modulate glucocorticoid receptor activity.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Knowledge graph for traditional Chinese medicine diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy: design, construction, and applications.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- TCMSF: A Construction Framework of Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Ancient Book Knowledge Graph.Methods of information in medicine · 2024Article
- CPMI-ChatGLM: parameter-efficient fine-tuning ChatGLM with Chinese patent medicine instructions.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Automated information extraction model enhancing traditional Chinese medicine RCT evidence extraction (Evi-BERT): algorithm development and validation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- AI-assisted literature exploration of innovative Chinese medicine formulas.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Persistent clinical symptoms and their association with CM syndromes in post-COVID-19 rehabilitation patients in Hong Kong.Heliyon · 2023Article
- RegEMR: a natural language processing system to automatically identify premature ovarian decline from Chinese electronic medical records.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Overview of Chatbots with special emphasis on artificial intelligence-enabled ChatGPT in medical science.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
- Application of Mathematical Modeling and Computational Tools in the Modern Drug Design and Development Process.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The practice of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) began several thousand years ago, and the knowledge of practitioners is recorded in paper and electronic versions of case notes, manuscripts, and books in multiple languages. Developing a method of information extraction (IE) from these sources to generate a cohesive data set would be a great contribution to the medical field. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review of the status of IE from TCM sources over the last 10 years. Methods: We conducted a search of four literature databases for articles published from 2010 to 2021 that focused on the use of natural language processing (NLP) methods to extract information from unstructured TCM text data. Two reviewers and one adjudicator contributed to article search, article selection, data extraction, and synthesis processes. Results: We retrieved 1234 records, 49 of which met our inclusion criteria. We used the articles to (i) assess the key tasks of IE in the TCM domain, (ii) summarize the challenges to extracting information from TCM text data, and (iii) identify effective frameworks, models, and key findings of TCM IE through classification. Conclusions: Our analysis showed that IE from TCM text data has improved over the past decade. However, the extraction of TCM text still faces some challenges involving the lack of gold standard corpora, nonstandardized expressions, and multiple types of relations. In the future, IE work should be promoted by extracting more existing entities and relations, constructing gold standard data sets, and exploring IE methods based on a small amount of labeled data. Furthermore, fine-grained and interpretable IE technologies are necessary for further exploration.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.