Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600715›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Female healthcare providers' knowledge, attitude, and practice towards cervical cancer screening and associated factors in public hospitals of Northwest Ethiopia.

Eden Abebaw, Mulugeta Tesfa, Wubishet Gezimu, Firomsa Bekele, Abdissa Duguma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eden AbebawDebre Markos Referral Hospital, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Mulugeta TesfaDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Science, Debre Markos University, Debre Markos, Ethiopia.
Wubishet GezimuDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5503-1360
Firomsa BekeleDepartment of Pharmacy, College of Health Science, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7855-9838
Abdissa DugumaDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Mettu University, Mettu, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-6061
Ethiopian Civil Service University · ETDebre Markos University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common gynaecological cancer in the world. Its incidence and burden are high in developing regions, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. The World Health Organization plans to increase vaccination, screening, and treatment of cases to 90%, 70%, and 90%, respectively, in developing countries by 2030. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cervical cancer screening and predictors among female healthcare providers. Methods: Institution-based cross-sectional survey was done from 4 March to 20 April 2019. The data were collected using a structured questionnaire. The data were entered into EpiData version 3.1 and analysed with SPSS version 25. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify associations. After controlling for confounders, an independent association was declared at a p-value of 0.05 with a 95% confidence interval. Results: Of a total of 404 participants, half were nurses. One hundred seventy-seven (43.8%) had adequate knowledge, 124 (30.7%) had a favourable attitude, and 35 (8.7%) had regular screening practice. The availability of trained personnel in the health facility and regular screening were variables associated with knowledge. Participants' attitude was shown association with profession, level of education, and knowledge. Moreover, knowledge of the causes of cervical cancer and knowledge of screening were variables significantly associated with screening practice. Conclusion and recommendations: Unfortunately, there is low adequate knowledge, low favourable attitude, and irregular screening practice of cervical cancer in the study area. Despite their own effects, their knowledge and attitude may affect the vast majority of their clients. Therefore, this finding calls for prompt action, such as training for participants to increase awareness, to shape their attitudes, and to increase the uptake of screening services.

Indexed as

attitudecervical cancer screeningfemale healthcare providerKnowledge

Identifiers

PMID35600715
PMCPMC9118899
OpenAlexW4285141627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.