Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600712›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Detecting professional interpreter use among patients with limited English proficiency: Derivation and validation study.

Jalal Soleimani, Alberto Marquez, Sawsan Fathma, Timothy J Weister, Amelia K Barwise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jalal SoleimaniDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-800X
Alberto MarquezAnesthesia Clinical Research Unit (ACRU), Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sawsan FathmaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Timothy J WeisterAnesthesia Clinical Research Unit (ACRU), Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Amelia K BarwiseDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9267-1298

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this derivation and validation study was to develop and validate a search strategy algorithm to detect patients who used professional interpreter services. Methods: We identified all adults who had at least one intensive care unit admission during their hospital stay across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise between 1 January 2015 and 30 June 2020. Three random subsets of 100 patients were extracted from 60,268 patients to develop the search strategy algorithm. Two physician reviewers conducted gold standard manual chart review and any discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. These results were compared with the search strategy algorithm each time it was refined. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated during each phase by comparing the search strategy results to the reference gold standard for both derivation cohorts and the final validation cohort. Results: The first search strategy resulted in a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 89%. The second revised search strategy achieved a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 87%. The final version of the search strategy was applied to the validation subset and sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 89%, respectively. Conclusion: We derived and validated a search strategy algorithm to assess interpreter use among hospitalized patients. Using a search strategy algorithm with high sensitivity and specificity can reduce the time required to abstract data from the electronic medical records compared with manual data abstraction.

Indexed as

data validation and derivationelectronic health record and systemsImplementation and deploymentintensive care

Identifiers

PMID35600712
PMCPMC9118401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.