Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600711›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Evaluation of antibiotic prescribing patterns among inpatients using World Health Organization indicators: A cross-sectional study.

Tesfaye Yimer Tadesse, Mulugeta Molla, Yohannis Shumet Yimer, Benyas Shishigie Tarekegn, Belayneh Kefale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tesfaye Yimer TadessePharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5747-7120
Mulugeta MollaPharmacology and Toxicology Unit, Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-5823
Yohannis Shumet YimerPharmaceutics and Social Pharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Debre Tabor University, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5871-3589
Benyas Shishigie TarekegnClinical Pharmacy Unit, Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Debre Tabor, Ethiopia.
Belayneh KefaleClinical Pharmacy Unit, Department of Pharmacy, College of Medical and Health Sciences, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-0861

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Even though antibiotic resistance is one of the most serious threats to global public health, it is becoming more common due to inappropriate antibiotic prescribing patterns. Thus, the purpose of this study is to assess antibiotic prescribing patterns among inpatients at an Ethiopian comprehensive specialized hospital. Methods: An institutional-based cross-sectional study was used. During the study period, data were collected from the charts of admitted patients in selected wards of Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital. The World Health Organization's developed questionnaire and conventional antibiotic prescribing indicators were used to assess rational drug usage, with an emphasis on antibiotic prescribing trends. The data were analyzed using SPSS 25.0 statistical software. Results: For 861 patients admitted to medical and pediatric wards, a total of 1444 antibiotics were prescribed. Overall, 60.6% of inpatients were prescribed at least one antibiotic, with an average (mean ± SD) number of antibiotics prescribed per patient of 1.7 ± 1.6. During their hospital stay, patients were given antibiotics for an average (mean ± SD) of 6.4 ± 2.7 days. Furthermore, 83.3% of antibiotics were prescribed for therapeutic purposes, whereas 100% were provided for empiric purposes. Ceftriaxone was the most commonly administered antibiotic in the study settings (49.2%). During the study period, Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital had access to 67.5% of key antibiotics. Conclusion: The antibiotic prescribing pattern in our study diverged from the World Health Organization-recommended guidelines. Furthermore, all antibiotics were given without a culture or sensitivity test in every case. Setting up an antibiotic stewardship program, introducing antibiotic use based on culture and sensitivity tests, and adopting institutional guidelines could all help to address this issue.

Indexed as

antibioticsprescribing indicatorsprescribing patternresistanceWHO

Identifiers

PMID35600711
PMCPMC9118891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.