Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600682›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Foraging decisions with conservation consequences: Interaction between beavers and invasive tree species.

Erika Juhász, Ákos Bede-Fazekas, Krisztián Katona, Zsolt Molnár, Marianna Biró

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erika JuhászDepartment of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology Institute of Biology Eötvös Loránd University Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4715-7211
Ákos Bede-FazekasCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2905-338X
Krisztián KatonaDepartment of Wildlife Biology and Management Institute for Wildlife Management and Nature Conservation Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences Gödöllő Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-2504
Zsolt MolnárCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5454-4714
Marianna BiróCentre for Ecological Research Institute of Ecology and Botany Vácrátót Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7673-1622

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Herbivore species can either hinder or accelerate the invasion of woody species through selective utilization. Therefore, an exploration of foraging decisions can contribute to the understanding and forecasting of woody plant invasions. Despite the large distribution range and rapidly growing abundance of beaver species across the Northern Hemisphere, only a few studies focus on the interaction between beavers and invasive woody plants.We collected data on the woody plant supply and utilization at 20 study sites in Hungary, at two fixed distances from the water. The following parameters were registered: taxon, trunk diameter, type of utilization, and carving depth. Altogether 5401 units (trunks and thick branches) were identified individually. We developed a statistical protocol that uses a dual approach, combining whole-database and transect-level analyses to examine foraging strategy.Taxon, diameter, and distance from water all had a significant effect on foraging decisions. The order of preference for the four most abundant taxa was

Indexed as

alluvial forestCastor fibercentral‐place foraging strategyecosystem engineer speciesfloodplaininvasion ecologyoptimal foraging strategy

Identifiers

PMID35600682
PMCPMC9108316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.