Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600661›Full record

ReviewBioengineering & translational medicine2022

Design and clinical application of injectable hydrogels for musculoskeletal therapy.

Øystein Øvrebø, Giuseppe Perale, Jonathan P Wojciechowski, Cécile Echalier, Jonathan R T Jeffers, Molly M Stevens, Håvard J Haugen, Filippo Rossi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Øystein ØvrebøDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta" Politecnico di Milano Milano Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9170-0202
Giuseppe PeraleIndustrie Biomediche Insubri SA Mezzovico-Vira Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-3141
Jonathan P WojciechowskiDepartment of Materials Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6272-515X
Cécile EchalierDepartment of Materials Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9733-5477
Jonathan R T JeffersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-6889
Molly M StevensDepartment of Materials Imperial College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7335-266X
Håvard J HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo Oslo Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6690-7233
Filippo RossiDepartment of Chemistry, Materials and Chemical Engineering "Giulio Natta" Politecnico di Milano Milano Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2665-120X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015651/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal defects are an enormous healthcare burden and source of pain and disability for individuals. With an aging population, the proportion of individuals living with these medical indications will increase. Simultaneously, there is pressure on healthcare providers to source efficient solutions, which are cheaper and less invasive than conventional technology. This has led to an increased research focus on hydrogels as highly biocompatible biomaterials that can be delivered through minimally invasive procedures. This review will discuss how hydrogels can be designed for clinical translation, particularly in the context of the new European Medical Device Regulation (MDR). We will then do a deep dive into the clinically used hydrogel solutions that have been commercially approved or have undergone clinical trials in Europe or the United States. We will discuss the therapeutic mechanism and limitations of these products. Due to the vast application areas of hydrogels, this work focuses only on treatments of cartilage, bone, and the nucleus pulposus. Lastly, the main steps toward clinical translation of hydrogels as medical devices are outlined. We suggest a framework for how academics can assist small and medium MedTech enterprises conducting the initial clinical investigation and post-market clinical follow-up required in the MDR. It is evident that the successful translation of hydrogels is governed by acquiring high-quality pre-clinical and clinical data confirming the device mechanism of action and safety.

Indexed as

bone regenerationcartilage regenerationclinical translationhydrogelsmedical devicesregenerative medicineviscosupplementation

Identifiers

PMID35600661
PMCPMC9115710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.