Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600655›Full record

ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2022

A biomimetic hyaluronic acid-silk fibroin nanofiber scaffold promoting regeneration of transected urothelium.

Yuqing Niu, Massimiliano Galluzzi, Fuming Deng, Zhang Zhao, Ming Fu, Liang Su, Weitang Sun, Wei Jia, Huimin Xia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Silk fibroin-based scaffolds for tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuqing NiuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9031-7989
Massimiliano GalluzziMaterials Interfaces Center, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences Shenzhen Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0404-4783
Fuming DengDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Zhang ZhaoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Ming FuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1400-0258
Liang SuDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Weitang SunDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Wei JiaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.
Huimin XiaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Research in Structural Birth Defect Disease, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University Guangzhou Guangdong China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0103-1672
Guangzhou Women and Children Medical Center · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the regulatory effect of hyaluronic acid (HA)-coating silk fibroin (SF) nanofibers during epithelialization of urinary tract for urethral regeneration. The obtained electrospun biomimetic tubular HA-SF nanofiber scaffold is composed of a dense inner layer and a porous outer layer in order to mimic adhesion and cavernous layers of the native tissue, respectively. A thin layer of HA-gel coating was fixed in the inner wall to provide SF nanofibers with a dense and smooth surface nano-topography and higher hydrophilicity. Compared with pure SF nanofibers, HA-SF nanofibers significantly promoted the adhesion, growth, and proliferation of primary urothelial cells, and up-regulate the expression of uroplakin-3 (terminal differentiation keratin protein in urothelium). Using the New Zealand male rabbit urethral injury model, the scaffold composed of tubular HA-SF nanofibers could recruit lumen and myoepithelial cells from the adjacent area of the host, rapidly reconstructing the urothelial barrier in the wound area in order to keep the urinary tract unobstructed, thereby promoting luminal epithelialization, smooth muscle bundle structural remodeling, and capillary formation. Overall, the synergistic effects of nano-topography and biophysical cues in a biomimetic scaffold design for effective endogenous regeneration.

Indexed as

electrospinninghyaluronic acidregenerationsilk fibrointissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID35600655
PMCPMC9115696
OpenAlexW3212929073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.