ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Investigating the Impact of the TUITEK
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The TUITEKFrontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Biomimetic rhythm programming and intelligent delivery: The BRIGHT transdermal patch revolutionizes chronotherapy for growth hormone treatment.Biomaterials translational · 2025Article
- Opportunities for digitally-enabled personalization and decision support for pediatric growth hormone therapy.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Evaluating the TUITEKFrontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Precision diagnostics in children.Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine · 2023Review
- Integration of nurse-led virtual reviews with growth hormone device-linked patient adherence information: a mixed methods feasibility study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Poor adherence to recombinant human growth hormone (r-hGH) treatment presents a significant barrier to achieving optimal growth outcomes. It is important to identify and address the treatment adherence-related needs of children prescribed r-hGH treatment, and develop new approaches to improve adherence. We aimed to measure the impact of the TUITEK Patients and Methods: The evaluation of the TUITEK Results: Between baseline and follow-up, the percentage of caregivers scoring as 'high risk' for emotional burden reduced by 37%; there was an improvement in confidence of self-administration by 57% and the percentage of caregivers scoring as 'high risk' for treatment-related anxiety reduced by 52%. At follow-up, all caregivers classified as 'high risk' within the disease and treatment coherence item at baseline moved into the 'low risk' category. Statistically significant changes in questionnaire scores between baseline and follow-up for disease and treatment understanding, emotional burden, self-administration, and treatment-related anxiety were also observed. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the TUITEK
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.