ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Focal Adhesion-Related Signatures Predict the Treatment Efficacy of Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prodigiosin Enhanced TMZ Chemosensitivity by Suppressing Focal Adhesion and Inhibiting Autophagy in Glioblastoma Cells.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Exploration of m7G-related immune genes and construction of a prognostic risk model in gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of upregulated Rho GTPase activating protein 12 causing resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- A telomerase regulation-related lncRNA signature predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response for gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Clinical Significance and Immune Infiltration Analyses of the Cuproptosis-Related Human Copper Proteome in Gastric Cancer.Biomolecules · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The current tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is insufficient for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer (GC). This study aimed to analyze the association between the focal adhesion pathway and therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with GC. Methods: RNA sequencing was performed on 33 clinical samples from patients who responded or did not respond to treatment prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The validation sets containing 696 GC patients with RNA data from three cohorts (PKUCH, TCGA, and GSE14210) were analyzed. A series of machine learning and bioinformatics approaches was combined to build a focal adhesion-related signature model to predict the treatment efficacy and prognosis of patients with GC. Results: Among the various signaling pathways associated with cancer, focal adhesion was identified as a risk factor related to the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy and prognosis in patients with GC. The focal adhesion-related gene model (FAscore) discriminated patients with a high FAscore who are insensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our training cohort, and the predicted value was further verified in the GSE14210 cohort. Survival analysis also demonstrated that patients with high FAscores had a relatively shorter survival compared to those with low FAscores. In addition, we found that the levels of tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) increased with an increase in FAscore, and the tumor microenvironment (TME) also shifted to a pro-tumor immune microenvironment. Conclusion: The FAscore model can be used to predict the treatment efficacy of chemotherapy and select appropriate treatment strategies for patients with GC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.