ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
The Prognostic Impact of Lymph Node Dissection on Primary Tumor Resection for Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Study.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma across different age groups: a population-based study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Selected patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent primary tumor resection have witnessed a survival benefit. Whether additional lymph node dissection (LND) would result in a better effect remain unknown. We investigated the prognostic impact of LND on patients with stage IV NSCLC who received primary tumor resection (PTR). Methods: Patients with stage IV NSCLC who underwent PTR were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2016. Propensity-score matching was performed to minimize the confounding effect, and lung cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) were compared after matching. Multivariable Cox regression was used to identify prognostic factors and to adjust for covariates in subgroup analysis. The effect of the number of lymph nodes examined on the CSS was evaluated by repeating the Cox analysis in a binary method. Results: A total of 4,114 patients with stage IV NSCLC who receive surgery met our criteria, of which 2,622 (63.73%) underwent LND and 628 patients were identified 1:1 in LND and non-LND groups after matching. Compared with the non-LND group, the LND group had a longer CSS (median: 23 vs. 16 months, p < 0.001) and OS (median: 21 vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable regression showed that LND was independently associated with favorable CCS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-0.89, P < 0.001] and OS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis suggested that LND is an independent favorable predictor to survival in the surgical patients who were older age (>60 years old), female, T3-4, N0, and M1a stage and those who underwent sublobar resection. In addition, a statistically significant CCS benefit was associated with an increasing number of lymph nodes examined through 25 lymph nodes. Conclusions: LND with a certain range of lymph nodes number examined was associated with improved survival for patients with stage IV NSCLC who received primary tumor resection. The results may have implications for guidelines on lymph nodes management in selective advanced NSCLC for surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.