Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35600400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Combination Therapy With Lenvatinib and Radiofrequency Ablation for Patients With Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Up-To-Seven Criteria and Child-Pugh Class A Liver function: A Pilot Study.

Feiqian Wang, Kazushi Numata, Satoshi Komiyama, Haruo Miwa, Kazuya Sugimori, Katsuaki Ogushi, Satoshi Moriya, Akito Nozaki, Makoto Chuma, Litao Ruan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Feiqian WangUltrasound Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Kazushi NumataGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoshi KomiyamaGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Haruo MiwaGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Kazuya SugimoriGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Katsuaki OgushiGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Satoshi MoriyaGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Akito NozakiGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Makoto ChumaGastroenterological Center of Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Litao RuanUltrasound Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Shin MaedaDivision of Gastroenterology of Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined lenvatinib (first-line systemic therapy) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) therapy in patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma with beyond up-to-seven criteria and Child-Pugh Class A liver function (CP A B2-HCC). Methods: Twenty-two patients with CP A B2-HCC were enrolled in the study. The patients had no history of systemic treatment. For the initial lenvatinib administration in this study, all of the patients had an adequate course of treatment (no less than two weeks) and were administered the recommended dose. Of them, 13 were treated by means of lenvatinib monotherapy (monotherapy group), while the 9 patients with no contraindication to RFA operation and who had consented to RFA received initial lenvatinib plus subsequent RFA (combination group). The clinical outcomes that were considered to evaluate the treatments included tumor response, prognosis (recurrence and survivals), and possible adverse events (serum liver enzymes and clinically visible complications). Results: The combination group exhibited a higher object response rate (9/9, 100%) as best tumor response than the monotherapy group (10/13, 76.9%). Longer progression-free survival (PFS) (12.5 months) and overall survival (OS) (21.3) were demonstrated in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (PFS: 5.5 months; OS:17.1 months). The combination group achieved a higher PFS rate (1-year: 74.1%) and OS rate (2-year: 80%) than the monotherapy group (1-year PFS rate: 0%; 2-year OS rate: 25.6%; for PFS, p<0.001; for OS, p=0.022). The treatment strategy was the independent factor for PFS (HR: 18.215 for monotherapy, p =0.010), which was determined by Cox regression analysis, suggesting that a combination strategy may reduce tumor progression when compared to the use of lenvatinib alone. There were no statistically significant intergroup differences that were observed in terms of adverse events, with the exception of ALT elevation (p=0.007) in the combination group. Conclusion: Our newly proposed combination therapy may potentially be effective and safe for CP A B2-HCC beyond up-to-seven criteria. A larger scale, multicenter, prospective study is warranted to confirm our findings.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinomaintermediate-stagelenvatinibradiofrequency ablationtreatmentsup-to-seven criteria

Identifiers

PMID35600400
PMCPMC9114706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.